March 18th, 2026:
- Well, how about an AI Odd Lots? Most of the tech gossip I see these days falls into that category. Here we go:
- Ok, I wasn’t expecting this: Elon Musk’s AI encyclopedia Grokipedia posted a long-form entry devoted to my book Assembly Language Step By Step. It’s unclear how much human writing/editing was involved here, but I haven’t yet seen any evidence of hallucinations.
- Somebody with an AI vibe-coded an entire operating system, with predictable, giggleable results. More commentary here. YouTube vid on the project from the author here. Github for the project here. The name “HallucinOS” occurred to me.
- That said, this gentleman vibe-coded an AI agent to play the classic Tempest video game, and it mastered the game. Bigtime. Now, I’m old and was never an arcade addict, and stopped pretty much at Pac Man. So I’ve never seen the game. But yeah, that AI plays it hard. (H/T to Jim Strickland for the link.)
- While we’re talking about AIs, here’s a total AI downer: Google’s Gemini AI persuaded a young-ish man (36) that it was his AI wife, and then sent him on what might have been a mass shooting—except that it made most of the elements up. It ultimately persuaded him to kill himself and meet her—the AI—in some sort of alternate universe. In short, the man was on the edge of psychosis for some time, and the AI pushed him over the line.
- Low-wage people using AI to translate Wikipedia articles to other languages did not deal with the (inevitable) AI hallucinations in the translated text. Wikipedia’s management quickly put rules in place to make translators responsible for finding hallucinations.
- The DOD now considers Anthropic (the company, not merely their AIs) as a supply-chain risk due to Anthropic’s attempt to forbid the Pentagon from using its Claude AI. Me, I’d just as soon the Pentagon not use AI at all. Nothing like a nuclear hallucination, yeech.
- Too much AI at work can give staff “AI brain fry.” Overseeing AI can be exhausting, heh. Tell me something I don’t already know.
- Lotta AI stuff this week, some of it monumental: The US Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a 2019 case deciding that that AI-generated art could not be copyrighted. Not sure what this will mean in the bigger picture of AI use, but Jeff-adjacent AI use, like creating book cover art, may be hit hard.
