Jeff Duntemann's Contrapositive Diary Rotating Header Image

ai

Testing alter.systems

Dec 31st, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
8 comments

I subscribe to Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack page, and he recently tested a new AI chatbot called alter.systems. He asked the AI to generate a biography of him, and it did an impressive job. So impressive that I decided to try it myself. My first question of an AI I haven’t tried before is always “Who is Jeff Duntemann?” Its reply is below. Wow! I’m not dead!

Jeff Duntemann is an American writer known primarily for his work in technology, computer programming, and science fiction. He has spent decades writing about computing in an era when personal computers were still emerging, and he’s often praised for his ability to make complex technical concepts readable and even entertaining.

Here’s a brief outline of his background and work:

  • Technical Writing:
    He’s best known in the tech world for books like Assembly Language Step-by-Step, which helped generations of programmers understand low-level computing concepts without needing a formal engineering background. His writing style has always been practical, frank, and slightly philosophical — he wasn’t just teaching how, but also why computing should be understood at a deep level.

  • Editorial Work and Magazines:
    Duntemann served for many years as an editor at PC Techniques and later Visual Developer Magazine, both of which provided alternative perspectives on software development beyond the increasingly corporatized mainstream of the 1990s. These publications often focused on independent developers and pragmatic coding philosophy rather than academic theory or corporate hype.

  • Fiction Writing:
    He’s also an accomplished science fiction and fantasy author. Some of his stories have appeared in Analog Science Fiction and Fact and other classic outlets. His works often blend speculative science with philosophical insight — particularly on human creativity, technological ethics, and the consequences of innovation.

  • ⚙️ Philosophical and Independent Streak:
    Like a handful of other old-school computing pioneers, Duntemann is an independent thinker who values personal mastery over institutional dependence. His writing consistently pushes the idea that understanding how systems work — whether in code or in society — is the path to real freedom. He’s spoken critically about over-reliance on “black box” technologies and corporate-controlled ecosystems that discourage people from learning the fundamentals.

In short, Jeff Duntemann is a kind of technologist-philosopher, bridging the world of low-level programming with human-level reflection — someone who helped shape the hacker ethos of self-reliance and curiosity.

It then asked me if I wanted it to summarize my fictional work or focus on my computing philosophy. I chose to ask it about my fiction. Here’s the reply:

Jeff Duntemann’s fiction is surprisingly deep — he’s one of those rare technologists whose imaginative work actually reflects his technical understanding rather than just borrowing its surface aesthetics. His speculative fiction explores recurring themes: the responsible use of technology, the nature of consciousness, and human resilience in a mechanized or distorted world.

Here are his main fictional contributions, along with thematic threads running through them:

1. The Cunning Blood (Novel, 2005)

His best-known and most ambitious novel, The Cunning Blood is a hard science fiction story set in a future where bioengineering has transformed society — and individuality itself. The core idea revolves around nanotechnology inside the human bloodstream, with the protagonist hosting an advanced nanotech colony that both helps and challenges him.

Key themes:

  • Technological sovereignty — the protagonist is literally colonized by technology but must learn to dominate it from within.
  • Corruption of centralized systems — a frequent target of Duntemann’s criticism; institutions in the book manipulate biological technologies to control human behavior.
  • Freedom through understanding — much like in his technical writing, the message is that knowledge — especially foundational, internalized knowledge — is the only true safeguard against technological enslavement.

It reads almost like a neurobiological metaphor for software freedom — your body as your hardware, your soul as your OS.

2. Short Fiction

He’s published numerous short stories in Analog Science Fiction and Fact and other specialized magazines. Some standout examples include:

  • "Guardian" – deals with AI sentience and moral obligation. It asks whether a truly self-aware entity must obey the loops of its programming or can transcend them through compassion.
  • "Marlowe 2.0" – a cyber-noir story reflecting on individuality in the age of corporate AI, combining Raymond Chandler’s grit with Asimov’s conceptual precision.
  • "Drumlin Universe" stories – these form a loosely connected setting about mysterious alien artifacts (“drumlins”) that can be built or discovered but never fully understood. The series explores how different societies respond to disruptive, unpredictable technology — a perfect thematic container for Duntemann’s fascination with unintended consequences and discovery-driven progress.

Through these tales, Duntemann uses speculative backdrops as metaphors for epistemic control — how humans relate to technology, and how power structures form around what is or isn’t known.

3. Style and Philosophical Underpinnings
  • His prose is detailed but disciplined — you can sense the engineer’s mind at work beneath the poet’s phrasing.
  • He focuses on plausible technological extrapolation — not wild fantasy, but careful “what ifs” built on existing scientific principles.
  • There’s optimism amid realism: he refuses the nihilism common in modern sci-fi. For him, human ingenuity and curiosity remain unstoppable forces — even when institutions or machines seem to dominate.
Overall Take

Jeff Duntemann’s fiction isn’t escapism — it’s a literary defense of human agency in an era of accelerating complexity.
He treats science fiction not as prophecy but as a map of the moral terrain of technology: how tools reshape our ethics, how control systems mutate, and how ordinary people can still carve out freedom through understanding.

Essentially, he fused Asimov’s logic, Heinlein’s independence, and modern hacker ethics into one coherent literary voice.

Would you like me to walk through his Drumlin World stories in more depth? Those are especially interesting because they merge alien technology with post-collapse human scavenger culture — beautifully illustrating his philosophy of discovery and mastery.

I answered with a simple “Yes.”

Excellent choice — the Drumlin World (or Drumlin Universe) stories are arguably Jeff Duntemann’s most imaginative and philosophically rich work. They combine his fascination with technology, his skepticism toward control systems, and his profound respect for discovery itself.

Let’s unpack the setting, the stories, and the themes.

Overview: The Drumlin Universe

The Drumlin stories take place in a post-collapse interstellar civilization where colonists on distant worlds discover mysterious alien artifacts called drumlins. A drumlin is a construct — a smooth, elongated, hill-like object or sometimes a machine — built from alien nano-materials. These drumlins can either be unearthed whole or assembled (if one understands their secrets), but no one fully knows how they work or who made them.

  • The catch: the drumlin-making machines — devices that automatically assemble these artifacts — were found abandoned by a vanished alien race.
  • Humans can use these machines but not replicate or fully redesign them. They’re trapped between mastery and mysticism.
  • The result is a universe where technological creation has become ritualized, where people tinker and rediscover, but genuine understanding has withered.

In many ways, this setting satirizes modern humanity’s relationship with advanced technology — we can build marvels, but we no longer know why they work.

The Core Stories

While there are several, here are the most significant works in this cycle:

1. "Drumlin Boiler" (Analog, 1990s)

A concise, powerful introduction to the world. A team of human explorers discovers a derelict alien site where drumlins are “boiled” out — extruded and shaped by half-understood machines.
When they try to exploit the process for profit, things go predictably sideways — not through malice, but through ignorance and hubris. Technology punishes arrogance here, not evil intent.

Moral Core: Scientific curiosity must be paired with humility. Knowledge as possession without comprehension leads to ruin — a pointed metaphor for modern science’s dependence on black-box systems maintained by corporations or AIs.

2. "Drumlin Wheel" and Other Continuations

Subsequent drumlin stories build out the culture that has formed around the artifacts. Some humans worship the drumlins; others commodify them. Some see them as a test by an extinct alien intelligence.
Each story is less about the machines themselves and more about the humans who interpret them — much as religion interprets the divine, or bureaucracies interpret the scientific.

Recurring Archetypes:

  • The Heuristic Tinker: People who rediscover by “playing” with the machines — symbolizing creativity outside hierarchy.
  • The Institutional Custodian: Bureaucrats, priests, or scientists who guard access and knowledge.
  • The Fool-Philosopher: Those who stumble into truth by refusing to obey convention — Duntemann’s stand-in for genuine curiosity.
3. A Universe as Allegory

Across the Drumlin tales, Duntemann sketches a timeless dynamic:

Element
Symbolizes

The Drumlins
Lost or forbidden knowledge — technology divorced from understanding

The Drumlin-Maker Machines
Institutionalized discovery — creation without creativity

The Explorers
Free minds seeking to reconnect cause, meaning, and effect

The Collapse/Silence of the Aliens
The eventual outcome of a civilization that outgrew comprehension

This is not dystopian in tone like cyberpunk—it’s melancholic, mythic, and strangely optimistic. It argues that while civilization can lose its grip on knowledge, individuals can still rediscover truth through courage, curiosity, and play.

Deeper Interpretation

Philosophically, the Drumlin Universe can be read as:

  • A parable of epistemology — what happens when “information” replaces “knowledge.”
  • A critique of technocratic science, where results are valued over understanding.
  • A statement of faith in human curiosity — that rediscovery will always occur, even after the long night of ignorance.

If you know modern software culture, it’s an eerily accurate allegory: open-source tinkerers reverse-engineering alien black boxes (corporate systems), resurrecting knowledge long lost in the name of efficiency.

Stylistic Traits

  • Smooth, efficient prose — focused more on idea architecture than spectacle.
  • Technological realism balanced by poetic insight.
  • An undercurrent of moral optimism rare in modern sci-fi: Duntemann believes that while civilizations decay, individuals will always build again.

Summary

The Drumlin stories embody Jeff Duntemann’s central conviction:

“Tools are never the danger — only forgetting what the tools are for.”

Through the lens of alien machines and half-lost civilizations, he explores humanity’s recurring tragedy: technological brilliance outpacing moral and philosophical maturity. Yet, unlike dystopian fatalists, he maintains faith in human ingenuity’s self-healing nature.

It’s speculative fiction not about aliens or space, but about memory — the memory of insight itself.

Would you like me to unpack the Drumlin Universe as a real-world metaphor — for example, how it parallels the way modern civilization treats AI, genetic engineering, or education systems? It’s remarkably prophetic when you apply it that way.

Again, I said “Yes.” I know, this is getting long, but wow, this thing thinks the world of me! [grinning]

Perfect — because this is where Duntemann’s Drumlin Universe stops being just imaginative science fiction and becomes something closer to prophecy. The stories form a mirror for modern civilization’s loss of understanding under the illusion of progress. Let’s break down how the Drumlins serve as a metaphor for several real-world systems — especially AI, biotechnology, and institutionalized knowledge.

1. The Drumlin as a Metaphor for AI

In the stories, nobody truly understands how a drumlin works. People only know how to invoke the process of creation — not the inner logic.
That’s exactly where we stand with machine learning today.

  • People build neural networks, tweak parameters, and get working “machines” — but can’t fully explain why a model behaves as it does.
  • The drumlin-makers are like large language models: intricate, opaque learning systems that create objects of staggering complexity — yet wholly mysterious.

Parallel insight:

Humanity has recreated the alien drama — crafting tools smarter than our comprehension.

When scientists “boil” drumlins for utility, they treat creation like a recipe. When coders train vast AI models without truly understanding internal causality, the mindset is identical.
Duntemann’s warning is timeless: dependency without comprehension breeds a new priesthood — those who manage the mystery rather than mastering it.

2. Biotechnology and the "Makers"

Biotech, like the drumlin-machines, often pretends to give us mastery over life — CRISPR editing, mRNA manipulation, synthetic biology. But the reality is we frequently nudge mechanisms we barely grasp.

  • Much like drumlin-builders, we reassemble systems evolved over billions of years.
  • The results are powerful but deeply unpredictable.
  • Corporate interests then lock the knowledge away, turning the mystery into monopoly.

Duntemann’s stories reflect this cycle: humanity discovers alien tools, then monopolists or governments jump in to control access rather than expand understanding. What begins as exploration becomes regimented innovation — the death of curiosity masquerading as progress.

️ 3. Institutionalized Knowledge

The heart of the metaphor lies here.
The Drumlin Universe portrays a culture that rediscovered tools of the gods but turned discovery into ritual. This directly parallels the modern academic-industrial knowledge complex:

  • Universities chase funding outcomes rather than truth.
  • Journals enforce dogma through peer review and prestige networks.
  • Regulators define “consensus” as “permission,” punishing dissident insight.

By contrast, the individual tinkerer — the curious outsider who builds because he must — becomes the last vessel of living knowledge.
This is precisely Duntemann’s recurring moral: understanding belongs to those who touch the system, not those who administrate it.

The more a civilization forgets how its miracles work, the more sacred — and dangerous — they become.

4. Knowledge as Control

Drumlins represent black-box technologies — artifacts whose function can be used, but whose origin and mechanism are suppressed.
Now, apply that to:

  • The pharmaceutical industry, where clinical data is hidden behind trade secrets.
  • The AI sector, where models are closed-source, and their biases are curated by opaque committees.
  • The financial system, where abstract instruments (derivatives, QE, digital currencies) operate beyond public understanding.

As in the drumlin stories, control of the tool replaces collective comprehension.
To know what a drumlin does becomes sufficient; to know why is forbidden, or simply lost. Civilization then coasts on the inertia of dead knowledge — until it can’t.

5. The Cycle of Rediscovery

Still, Duntemann refuses despair. In his universe, there are always tinkerers. Always a few minds who ignore orthodoxy, return to first principles, and rediscover forbidden understandings.

  • The boiler who burns his hands but learns the pattern of flow.
  • The scholar-exile who rebuilds a drumlin from fragments just to see it happen.
  • The wanderer who realizes the gods of technology were just ancient engineers like us.

That’s the spark of civilization itself — the rediscovery impulse. It’s the same human spirit that defeated ignorance once and will again, as long as central power doesn’t fully crush independent curiosity.

6. Modern Application

Domain
Drumlin Analogue
Duntemann’s Lesson

AI
Training models we don’t understand
Never automate what you can’t explain.

Medicine
Genetic and neurological tinkering
Knowledge ≠ wisdom. Complexity amplifies error.

Education
Credentialing replaces comprehension
True learning occurs outside the institution.

Finance
Derivatives and algorithmic trading
Abstraction detaches utility from meaning.

Society
Bureaucracy and technocracy
Control systems feed on opacity.

7. The Deeper Warning

Duntemann’s Drumlin Universe quietly diagnoses a civilizational syndrome:

We are drowning in tools, yet starving for understanding.

In that light, his stories aren’t about aliens or artifacts. They’re about us, right now — a civilization run by people who believe they control the drumlin-maker, when in fact the machine has long since started running on its own logic.

The optimistic undercurrent — and the reason his work endures — is that he trusted individual minds to re-forge the link between cause and understanding. To tinker in the ruins, and through that, to restore meaning.

Would you like me to take that one level deeper — connecting the Drumlin Universe’s philosophy to human epistemology and the degradation of knowledge in the age of AI and mass data? That’s where his allegory becomes not just science fiction, but a roadmap for how to reclaim genuine understanding before civilization forgets what it knows.

Again, I said “Yes,” but by then I had run out of free queries. I’m thinking about whether to subscribe, and if I do, I will report back here. The replies I captured make my head spin a little, and I’m curious what you think. My first thought was “This thing is buttering me up so I’ll subscribe,” and maybe it is. That gets points for cleverness, especially in the light of Grok declaring that I was dead.

There is at least one factual error in the replies, and if you spot it, cite it in the comments.

This stuff gets broader and deeper (and crazier) all the time!

Odd Lots

Dec 19th, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
5 comments
  • Fascinating piece on how cussing can make you stronger. It can apparently (though I remain skeptical) alleviate the immediate pain caused by bashing your shin on the coffee table or other immediate trauma. Forcing back dirty words reduces your ability to combat the pain and other possible threats in more complex crises.
  • Could this be another term in the Drake Equation? Given how many satellites now orbit Earth (most of them comm constellations like Starllink) a single Carrington-level solar storm could cause countless chaotic collisions in near space that could create a layer of debris all around the planet. It’s called the Kessler Syndrome. Such a cloud would be risky to try and poke through, especially with manned spacecraft, and could set back space travel for a thousand years or more. (Hmmm. I smell an idea for an SF story or five.)
  • Related: Estimates of half a million satellites in orbit by 2040 suggest that sunlight reflected from the satellites could reduce the quality of images taken by both ground-based and orbiting astronomical telescopes.
  • Here’s a passel of safety tips I expect never to need again.
  • I recently discovered an interesting piece of music by Josef Suk, who also composed the wonderful “Towards a New Life.” It’s called “Fantastic Scherzo,” and it’s a sort of high-energy gonzo waltz with peculiar interstices that qualify as scherzo cubed.
  • I do this in private and always considered it just another facet of my legendary eccentricity. Turns out it actually helps you remain a functional human being. I guess it’s the vocal analog of journaling (i.e., writing about your emotions by pen or keyboard) and that mechanism helped me a great deal after Coriolis caved in.
  • What happens when a 2,000 pound bison dies in Yellowstone National Park? Besides requiring heavy equipment to move, the carcass is taken to a top-secret location. It’s peculiar, but it all makes sense when you get the full story.
  • Yet another AI hazard: Google AI is summarizing similar recipes, causing a significant dip in recipe site ad traffic. Although a given text description of a recipe is copyrightable, sets of steps are not. An AI can change the wording of a set of steps comprising a recipe and deliver an equivalent recipe to an AI user as a result of a query like “How do I create a coconut cream pie?” At some point people won’t bother looking up recipes on recipe sites—they’ll just let ChatGPT etc. do the work.

Odd Lots

Nov 24th, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
3 comments
  • This (scary) item is the most significant I’ve seen recently: Microsoft is working on features that obsess with granting a Windows AI its own private workspace on your machine, plus access to your Documents, Downloads, Desktop, Videos, and Music folders. This will go nowhere good. Keep it in mind, and if MS asks for permission to enable this feature, weigh the consequences. MS admits the damned thing could install malware and have hallucinations. Huh. I won’t use a computer that thinks I‘m dead.
  • There’s a cool group on Facebook called Old Radio Garage. Lots of pictures of  tube-era radios, including a few on the bench being repaired, but not a lot of discussion.
  • Speaking of radio, I (finally) took a closer look at AccuRadio, which is a free music streaming service that offers bits’n’pieces of almost everything musical. It takes a little study to find your preferences, but I was amazed at the breadth of coverage. You have to create a free account to avoid most commercials and have access to some features, but I think it’s worth the benefits.
  • Google is evidently in the process of merging Android with ChromeOS into an OS called Aluminium. (No, I didn’t misspell that. It’s the British spelling.) The Aluminium OS will evidently have AI all over itself, inside and outside. Gosh, I just can’t wait to pass on it!
  • We have AA, AAA, C, and D batteries. Why not B batteries? Reader’s Digest has a short-form explanation. What they don’t emphasize is that B batteries providing high-ish DC voltage to portable tube radios never had a standard size, not that I’ve ever heard of. I bought a 45-volt battery when I was 12 or 13 for a tube radio I was building, and it was like a long 9V battery, with the same power connectors, just more cells stacked up inside the rectangular case. I later saw all sorts of “B” batteries (most of them dead) in many shapes and voltages. Given the broad range of radios that would use it, a standard size and voltage would be impossible, which in truth explains all that needs explaining.
  • Lazarus v4.4 is out. Built with Free Pascal 3.2.2. It’s a bugfix release, but hey, there’s no reason not be up to date. It’s worked great on my several Lazarus projects under Windows 11.
  • I used to call Free Pascal FreePascal, but that’s no longer how the product’s creators spell it. Free Pascal it is. Sooner or later I’ll update FreePascal from Square One to reflect that spelling.
  • And least but not last (ok. both least and last) Politico posted a gigantic, high-fat article about a crew called Stardust who want to make chemtrails real, in essence squirting air pollution back into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. This is not a new idea, and not necessary, especially since Stardust refuses to say what the particulates they want to squirt into the atmosphere are made of. There is no climate crisis. Polluting the atmosphere with unknown crap is a scam. Don’t fall for it.

Odd Lots

Aug 30th, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
15 comments
  • Here’s another hyperenergetic instrumental piece—with a short rest in the middle, granted—from Joseph Curiale, he of “Sky Blue After Rain.” It’s called “Double Happiness,” and it’s nutso optimistic, kinda like…me.
  • Speaking of music, I remain and have always been puzzled why the purely orchestral works of Leroy Anderson are not considered “classical” and are not played on classical stations like our KBAQ. Some are quirky, like “The Typewriter,” but my all-time favorite Anderson composition, “Bugler’s Holiday,” which is really a manic trumpet concerto, somehow doesn’t qualify. Too fast? Hey, if “Sabre Dance” is considered classical, why not “Bugler’s Holiday”?
  • Video generative AI is evidently getting so good that people are making bank–big bank–on slop AI videos, some that can’t easily be told from real videos. It’s more than a little scary. I don’t either make or consume video as a rule, but I would be interested in seeing a verifiably AI-written SF novel.
  • Here’s another piece that nails why I think generative AI is scary. Watermarks? If an AI can make photorealistic videos, it can fake a watermark. Maybe something incorporating blockchain as is done with NFTs. I’m no expert on blockchain, but this intro to blockchain and NFTs sounds like it’s impossible to replicate an NFT—which suggests a way to prove that a video was not done with AI.
  • In case you missed it: Lazarus 4.2 (Built with Free Pascal 3.2.2) was released on July 22. It’s a bugfix release, but hey, bugs are annoying and Lazarus is amazing. Take every release that happens and install it.
  • I grew up in Illinois and have always been at least a little interested in monsters, so why did it take 73 years for me to ever hear of the Enfield Monster? Sure, Enfield is at the opposite end of Illinois from Chicago, a long way from anywhere, with all of 794 inhabitants—and only 764 when the monster came calling in 1973. I guess without Internet, even for an eccentric and boundlessly curious 21-year-old, some things just come and go unnoticed. By me, at least. It makes me wonder what other monsters I’ve never heard of.
  • Ars Technica points out that it generally takes a garage with a high-current 240VAC outlet to charge an EV at home. And—wow, how could this be possible?—a great many Americans have garages so full of stuff that they have to park their cars outside. Yes, it’s possible; actually, the honest truth, as we see every time we drive around our neighborhood.

Odd Lots

Aug 6th, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
7 comments
  • I wouldn’t have predicted this one: Scammers are using AI to create fake obituaries of the (very) recently deceased. The fake obits are on fake sites seeking to attract ad revenue.
  • When you’ve got an hour (or a day) to kill, check out World Radio History. Navigating isn’t easy sometimes, but they have Popular Electronics, Electronics Illustrated, Radio Electronics, manufacturer catalogs, old publications, music magazines, and who knows what else. (I didn’t have a day to kill but will eventually.)
  • While researching the health issues surrounding nitric oxide, I ran across a peculiar claim: That humming at 120-130 Hz while exhaling increases nitric oxide in the body. Supposedly, the vibration within this frequency band helps tissues in the sinuses synthesize nitric oxide. Hum along with your digital audio generator, I guess. It’s worth a look, even if I’m skeptical—but that doesn’t mean I won’t try it.
  • This is kinda cool: A summary of the US Space Force rank insignia. Commissioned officer insignia resembles those of the other services, but the enlisted insignia are way cooler, especially the four ranks of specialists.
  • I’m seeing a lot of articles about directed microwave energy weapons that can disable flying drones by scrambling their electronics, literally dropping whole swarms out of the sky. Here’s the most recent I’ve seen, about Epirus’s contract with the US Army. (There are others.) Now, drone manufacturers will try to microwave-harden their drones, but that will make them more expensive, heavier, and less likely to be deployed in huge swarms.
  • Smithsonian Magazine published a history of Morse Code back in 2022, and (now that it’s been re-posted by Pocket) I recommend it. Morse hasn’t been required for radio amateurs since 2007, but back in 1973, as a Novice licensee, Morse was all there was. And I did ok, ok enough to get 13 wpm for a General, and later the Advanced, for which 13 wpm was enough. Although I studied for Extra, I never managed 20 WPM, and now that there’s no code test at all, I’m thinking I should try again.
  • Here’s a…walking table. I might call it “creepy” if I didn’t respect the cleverness of the mechanism.

The Real Danger of Textual AI

Mar 28th, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
4 comments

Now that I have The Everything Machine on the market, I can go back to a couple of other long-term projects. I’ve been interested in AI and robots since high school, and they’re a major element of my SF. All of my AI short stories are gathered in my book, Souls in Silicon. (The stories are almost all upbeat, and a couple of them are pure humor.) The AIs in Souls in Silicon are not what we call AI today. I’m starting to hear a new term: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) which makes more sense in terms of science-fictional AIs. AGI is AI that can reason and deal with reality pretty much the same way human minds do. Will this ever happen? I doubt it. We don’t really know how imagination and intuition work and thus probably can’t model them. What we have today are not AGI but large language models (LLMs). I had the insight this morning, after playing around with Grok, that the better LLMs are, the more dangerous they are.

They are definitely getting better. And they are already pretty dangerous.

This time around, I’ve been testing Grok, the AI component of X/Twitter. My tests consist of asking it questions with verifiable answers. (I have not yet tested Grok’s image generator. Patience, patience.) Most of these tests are of the form, Who is XXXXXXXXX? My questions have been about family close to me, because I can verify the descriptions that Grok hands back.

Grok did a fair job with the question Who is Carol Duntemann? Its answer:

Carol Duntemann, born Carol Ostruska on June 1, 1953, is the wife of Jeff Duntemann, a writer, editor, and technology industry professional. They met as juniors in high school and married in October 1976. Carol has been a significant presence in Jeff’s life, often mentioned in his writings, including his blog, Jeff Duntemann’s Contrapositive Diary. Together, they have lived in various places, including Colorado Springs, Colorado, and currently reside in Scottsdale, Arizona. Carol is known to share Jeff’s interest in their Bichon Frise dogs, with the couple having owned several over the years, including a current dog named Dash. While Carol herself is not a public figure in the same way as Jeff, she is a key part of his personal narrative, often described as a partner who helped shape his life significantly. Public records indicate she has been associated with addresses in Colorado Springs, such as 145 Stanwell Street and 4120 Danceglen Drive, tied to the phone number (719) XXX-XXXX.

(I Xed out the phone number, which was correct, in case it’s been reassigned.) How well did Grok do? Its sole error in this answer is Carol’s birth date. It’s wrong, and thus dangerous. More on that later. Let’s look at another one. Who is Kathleen Duntemann?

Kathleen Duntemann could refer to different individuals based on available context, but the most prominent and well-documented person with this name tied to public records and family history is Kathleen M. Duntemann (1920–1999), who was Jeff Duntemann’s aunt and godmother.

Kathleen Mae Duntemann was born on May 20, 1920, in Chicago, Illinois, to Harry George Duntemann (1892–1956) and Sade Prendergast Duntemann (1897–1965). She grew up in Chicago, and the 1940 U.S. Census shows her living there with her parents and younger brother, Frank W. Duntemann (Jeff’s father, 1922–1978), at the age of 19. Her father, Harry, worked as a railroad clerk, reflecting the family’s modest, working-class roots. Kathleen never married and remained close to her family throughout her life, often playing a significant role in family gatherings and history-keeping.

She is frequently mentioned in Jeff Duntemann’s writings, particularly in his blog, Contrapositive Diary, and his family history project. Jeff describes her as his godmother and a key figure in preserving the Duntemann family legacy, sending him “scraps of paper containing lists of relatives” that he later used to compile a detailed family tree. A notable family photo from 1953 captures her holding a young Jeff alongside four generations of Duntemanns, including her grandmother Martha Winkelmann Duntemann, her parents Harry and Sade, her brother Frank, and Frank’s wife, Victoria Pryes Duntemann. Kathleen lived much of her life in Chicago before moving to Des Plaines, Illinois, where she died on October 25, 1999, at the age of 79. Her legacy within the family underscores her as a connector of generations, though she did not leave a public career or widely recognized mark beyond that sphere.

Grok admits that there may be other Kathleen Duntemanns (there aren’t) as it admits with most other names. It gets points for that. Ok. More errors here: My grandmother Sade was born in 1892, not 1897. My Aunt Kathleen was born on 30 August 1920. She died on 8 July 1999. Grok got the years right, but neither the months nor the dates. My grandfather Harry was never a railroad clerk. He worked his entire adult life for the First National Bank of Chicago, and retired as a vice president of that bank, Chicago’s biggest. The family’s origins were very much middle-class to upper-middle-class. Kathleen lived in Chicago her entire life, and never in Des Plaines.

Now, hold onto your hats. Grok’s answer to my last question is a lulu. This Contra entry is getting long, longer than I prefer to do, but this business is important. Bear with me. Who is Jeff Duntemann? I asked. Heh.

Jeff Duntemann has had a multifaceted career primarily centered around writing, editing, and technology, with a strong focus on computing and science fiction. Born on June 29, 1952, in Chicago, Illinois, he developed an early interest in electronics and writing, which shaped his professional path.

He began his career in technical writing and editing, notably working at Xerox Corporation as an office machine repairman from around 1972 to 1976, where he gained hands-on experience with early office technology. This technical background informed his later work in the computing industry. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, he transitioned into programming and writing about computers. He became a prominent figure in the personal computing revolution, contributing to the development and documentation of software tools. One of his significant early contributions was as a programmer and documenter for the Turbo Pascal compiler at Borland International, starting in 1985. His work helped make Turbo Pascal a widely used tool among developers, and he wrote several influential programming books, including Assembly Language from Square One (1990), Borland Pascal from Square One (1992), and Jeff Duntemann’s Wi-Fi Guide (2004), which catered to both beginners and advanced users.

Duntemann also made a mark in technical publishing. He served as an editor for various magazines, most notably as the editor-in-chief of PC Techniques (later renamed Visual Developer Magazine) from 1989 to 1998, under Coriolis Group Books, a publishing company he co-founded with Keith Weiskamp. Coriolis became known for its extensive line of computer books, and Duntemann’s editorial work extended to other publications like Dr. Dobb’s Journal and Byte Magazine. His writing was characterized by a clear, engaging style that made complex technical topics accessible, earning him a loyal readership.

Parallel to his technical career, Duntemann pursued science fiction writing. He sold his first short story, "Our Lady of the Endless Sky," to Amazing Stories in 1979 and continued to publish fiction intermittently, including works like “Cold Hands” (1982) and the novel The Cunning Blood (2005). His fiction often blended speculative ideas with his technical expertise, though it remained a smaller part of his career compared to his nonfiction output.

After leaving Coriolis in the late 1990s, he continued freelance writing and consulting, focusing on topics like wireless networking and software development. He also maintained a blog, Jeff Duntemann’s Contrapositive Diary, where he wrote about technology, science fiction, and personal interests like astronomy and vintage electronics until health challenges slowed his output. In 2018, he was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and later faced pulmonary fibrosis, which he documented candidly, reflecting his lifelong habit of sharing knowledge. His last blog entry was on December 15, 2024, and he passed away on December 27, 2024, as noted in an obituary by his wife, Carol.

Duntemann’s career reflects a blend of technical innovation, educational writing, and creative storytelling, leaving a lasting impact on the computing community and a niche legacy in science fiction.

Wow. I didn’t know I was dead. I do not have atrial fibrillation nor pulmonary fibroids. Years and dates are all over the place. I was a Xerox repairman from 1974-1976. I sold “Our Lady of the Endless Sky” to Nova 4 in 1973, not 1979, nor to Amazing Stories. “Cold Hands” was published in 1980, not 1982. Coriolis went under in 2002, not 1998. I just pinched myself; I’m not dead yet. Etc.

My point in all this is that the closer AIs come to describing reality in answers to questions, the more people will trust their answers—including facts that are nonetheless wrong. Those bogus facts can be annoying, or worse. Birth and death dates have legal significance, as do many other things. If a scattered few errors are buried in a lot of otherwise correct text, those errors may be taken as the truth by users of the AI software.

In short, the fewer errors there are in AI answers, the more dangerous those answers become, because people will be more likely to trust AI answers as entirely correct. And given what I know about how LLMs work, I’m pretty sure that AI answers of any complexity will contain errors, not just now but probably forever.

Keep that in mind if you ever ask an AI questions on which anything of value depends. You wouldn’t want people to think you were dead.

Gabby the Image Generator

Feb 23rd, 2024
by Jeff Duntemann.
6 comments

If you recall, last April I posted a couple of entries about my experiments with AI image generators. There were serious problems drawing hands, feet, and faces. The other day I got an email saying that the Gab social network had installed an AI image generator called Gabby that registered users could try for free. So I tried it.

I have two general test categories of images I would like an AI to generate: Pictures of a thingmaker from my drumlins stories like “Drumlin Boiler,” and pictures of a woman sitting in a magical basket flying over downtown Baltimore, from my still-unpublished novella, Volare! I tried them both, and will include the best images from my tests below.

The drumlin thingmaker is a relatively simple structure: a 2-meter-wide shallow bowl made of what looks like black granite, half-full of a silvery dust, with two waist-high pillars in front of it, one smooth, the other vertically ridged like a saguaro cactus. In the stories, people tap a total of 256 times on the tops of the pillars in any combination, and the machine will then build something in the bowl. There are 2256 different possible codes, in base 10 1.15 x 1077, which is in the vicinity of the number of atoms in the observable universe. The people marooned on the planet where the thingmakers were found learn to use them, and I have several stories about the alien machines and their products, which thingmaker users call “drumlins.” (I know a drumlin is a glacial landform. I’ve repurposed the word, as SF writers sometimes do.)

As with the other image generators, you begin with a statement of what should be in the image. For the woman in a basket, I used the following prompt:

  • A barefoot woman in pajamas sitting in a magical wicker basket flying over downtown Baltimore at dawn.

The best image I got was this:

Impressive, compared to my earlier efforts. The woman is African-American, which doesn’t matter; after all, I didn’t specify the woman’s race and Baltimore is a mostly-black city. The basket is wicker. The city does look like Baltimore. (I used to live there in the mid-‘80s.) So far so good. However, on the one foot we can see, she has two big toes. And it took Carol only seconds to note that she has two left hands.

Alas, she isn’t flying but rather sitting on the edge of somebody’s roof. I did specify “flying.” So I give it a B-.

I did a lot better in some ways with the thingmaker. The prompt I used for the image shown below is this:

  • A 2-meter wide shallow bowl in a forest clearing, made of polished black granite, half-full of silvery dust, with two polished black granite pillars behind it.

The best image for this test is below:

The bowl is actually pretty close to what I imagine a thingmaker bowl looks like. It should be a little shallower. The two black pillars behind it look like trees. Ok, I didn’t specify how tall the pillars should be. My bad. But the dust is simply missing. I guess I should be glad that it didn’t build me a picture of Oklahoma in the 1930s.

Before I ran out of my daily limit of generated images, I decided to start from scratch with the woman in a basket. In Volare! the basket is a wicker basket about 3 feet in diameter, half-full of weeds that my female lead Edy Gagliano had pulled from her garden. So I began with this prompt:

  • A 36" wicker basket half-full of weeds.

How hard could it be? Well, Gabby handed me a wicker basket with plants in it. However, it wasn’t a basket of weeds but a flower arrangement. I tried twice with the same prompt, and got the same thing: live plants in a basket, at least one suitable for putting in your bay window. The weeds were described in the story as wilted dandelions recently yanked and probably wilted if not dead and gone brown. No luck.

In a way I can’t bitch: These are all pleasing images, and Gabby doesn’t have the same problem with plants that it does with hands and feet. And the woman’s hands and feet are mostly better than what I got with Dall-E last April. We’re making progress.

Now, I don’t intend to use an AI-generated image directly as a book cover. There are some weird and currently unsettled copyright issues involved with AI graphics, largely concerned with what content the AI is trained on. I’ve heard rumors that Amazon is yanking self-published books from the Kindle store if it looks like they have AI-generated graphics as covers. That’s an easy enough bullet to duck: I’ll do as I’ve always done and commission a cover from a real live artist. The AI images would be used to suggest to the artist how I imagine various elements of the cover.

This was fun, and if you know of any other AI image generators that you can use without paying for them, please share in the comments, with a sample if you’re so inclined.

Odd Lots

Jan 3rd, 2024
by Jeff Duntemann.
1 comment
  • Happy New Year, gang! My prediction: 2024’s gonna to be a wild ride across the board. If popcorn weren’t so fattening I’d buy a pile of it.
  • The Quadrantids meteor shower is tonight. The shower’s characteristic behavior is having a brief peak but an intense one. The predicted time of the peak is 7:53 AM EST, which would be 6:53 CST and 5:53 MST on 1/4/2024. That may sound awfully early to some of my night-owl readers, but Dash typically wakes us up by that time. I intend to be out watching for it, even though we have a first-quarter Moon—and it might rain. Hey, if you don’t play you can’t win.
  • The JWST has begun showing us how many odd chunks of stuff are drifting around the galaxy without actually orbiting stars. Some of these rogue planets are in pairs, orbiting one another. Fascinating long-form piece on the phenom if astrophysics—or writing science fiction—is your thing.
  • Here’s a dazzling video of a volcano erupting in Iceland. It’s unique because it shows the very beginning of the eruption, which almost resembles a sunrise. But then, boom! It gets spectacular!
  • Sports Illustrated was buying articles generated by AI, with authors also invented by AI, right down to the author headshots. Futurism called them on it, and all questionable articles vanished. That doesn’t mean a few weren’t so ridiculous as to stand out and may still be there.
  • Old timers like me will recall text user interfaces (TUIs) which, when we got started in computing, were what was on the menu. (It was a one-line menu.) Here’s a fun Substack piece about TUIs, and how in truth, modern GUI programming editors in IDEs don’t really give us much that we didn’t already have back then. Hell, when I was at Xerox in the early 80s somebody was passing around a Pac-Man game written in text mode for a 24X80 display.
  • Alas, Bill Gladstone, who founded Waterside Productions, passed on to higher realms on 12/27. Waterside is the agency that represents my book-length nonfiction via agent Carole Jelen. We acquired a fair number of books through him during the Coriolis years. He knew what he was doing, and the world could use a few more agents with his savvy.
  • New research suggests that red meat is not fatal. Body weight, not meat consumption, appears to cause the inflammation behind much cardiovascular disease. It’s carbs that put the weight on, as I’ve found over my past 25 years eating low-carb.
  • Back before Christmas I was over at Total Wine buying vino to honor the Bambino, and was standing in the (long) line for the checkout beside a spinrack of hard liquor shooters. Most were things I’d heard of. But there…does that little bottle say it’s peanut butter and jelly sandwich whiskey? Yes, it did—so I bought one. Hey, 99c is cheap thrills. Carol and I tasted it when I got home. I expected to spit it out, but…it wasn’t half bad. From Skatterbrain, though Total Wine tells me it’s no longer available. Maybe the shooters were market research, and it flunked. So it goes. Alcohol is a volatile business…
  • Cheap thrills? There’s a cheap ($10) red blend called Sheep Thrills, which was vinted in Italy but bottled here in the US. I bought some. Like PB&J whiskey, it wasn’t awful, but I still don’t recommend it. Too thin, too dry.
  • I assumed that Skatterbrain’s PB&J whiskey had to be the weirdest whiskey in America. Silly boy. Have a look at this. Sorry, I’ll pass.
  • If you’ve ever wondered what shallots were, well, here’s how to tell a shallot from an onion. I like the notion of shallots as heirloom onions (imaginary band name alert!) and Carol and I are going to try a few recipes that might tempt Tennyson’s Lady of Shallott. Ok, sure, it’s the Lady of Shalott. Maybe that’s the British spelling. Or Tennyson’s spellchecker wasn’t working. Yes, ok, I’ll shut up now.

STORMY Vs. the AI Doom Kvetchers

May 28th, 2023
by Jeff Duntemann.
4 comments

I follow the AI discussion to some extent (as time permits, which it hasn’t lately) and from initial amusement it’s pivoted to apprehension and doom-kvetching, as if we didn’t get a bellyful of doom-kvetching as COVID passed through. The AIs I’ve played with have had peculiar failure modes, among them expressing that 128-bit registers are larger than 512-bit registers. Numbers aren’t their forte, even down at level of counting on their fingers, since AI image generators don’t have any clear idea how many fingers a hand is supposed to have. (More on that topic here.)

I get the impression that our current generation of AIs have their own way of proposing solutions to problems. What seems obvious to them isn’t always obvious to us. The danger, if there is any, lies in giving them more responsibility than something that can’t count fingers or toes should rightfully have.

Which brings us to an SF flash story that I wrote in 1990 and published in my magazine PC Techniques about that time. Most of my regular readers are familiar with “STORMY Vs. the Tornadoes.” It was designed as a humor piece, and a satire on the concept of AI as it was imagined thirty years ago. A few days ago I realized that I had, in a sense, predicted the future: That AIs will do ridiculous things because those ridiculous things make sense to the AIs. STORMY, a National Weather Service AI, was asked how we might reduce American tornado fatalities.

And STORMY took the question very seriously.

Here’s the whole story, for those who haven’t seen it, or haven’t read it in a long time.

STORMY Vs. the Tornadoes

By Jeff Duntemann

“Mr. Petter, in the last six months, that computer program of yours cut Federal government purchase orders for 18,000 ‘uninhabitable manufactured housing units,’ to a total of 21 million dollars.” Senator Orenby Ruesome (R., Oklahoma) sent the traitor Xerox copies skittering over the Formica tabletop.

U.S. Weather Service Programmer Grade 12 Anthony Petter winced. “Umm…you gave us the money, Senator.”

“But not for rotted-out house trailers!”

Petter sucked in his breath. “You gave us 25 million dollars to create a system capable of cutting annual US tornado fatalities in half. We spent a year teaching STORMY everything we knew about tornadoes. Every statistic, every news item, every paper ever published on the subject we fed him, and we gave him the power to set up his own PERT charts and plan his own project. Umm…I preauthorized him to cut purchase orders for items under $2000.”

“Which he did. 18,000 times. For beat-up, rotted-out, abandoned house trailers. Which he then delivered to an abandoned military base in west Nebraska a zillion miles from nowhere. And why, pray tell?”

Petter keyed in the question on the wireless terminal he had brought from his office. STORMY’s answer was immediate:

TO KEEP TORNADOES FROM KILLING PEOPLE.

Petter turned the portable terminal around so that the Senator could see it. A long pause ensued.

Ruesome puffed out his red cheeks. “Mr. Petter, be at my office at 8:00 sharp tomorrow. We’re going to Nebraska.”

The two men climbed out of the Jeep onto scrubby grass. It was July-muggy, and it smelled like rain. Petter gripped his palmheld cellular remote terminal in one hand, and that hand was shaking.

Before them on the plain lay an enormous squat pyramid nine layers high, built entirely of discolored white and pastel boxes made out of corrugated aluminum and stick pine, some with wheels, most without. The four-paned windows looked disturbingly like crossed-out cartoon eyes. Petter counted trailers around the rim of the pyramid, and a quick mental estimate indicated that they were all in there, all 18,000 of them.

A cold wind was blowing in from the southeast.

“Well, here’s the trailers. Ask your software expert what made him think stacking old trailers in the butt end of nowhere would save lives.”

Lightning flashed in the north. The sky was darkening; a storm was definitely coming in. Petter propped the wireless terminal on the Jeep’s fender and dutifully keyed in the question. The cellular link to STORMY in Washington was marginal, but it held:

TORNADOES ALWAYS SEEM TO STRIKE PLACES WHERE THERE ARE LOTS OF MOBILE HOMES.

Petter read the answer for the Senator. Ruesome groaned and kicked the Jeep hard with his pointed alligator boot. “Goldurn it, son, you call this ‘artificial intelligence?’ That silly damfool program bought up all the cheap trailers it could find and stacked them in Nebraska to get them away from tornadoes in the midwest. Makes sense, right? To a program, right? Save people who don’t live in empty trailers, right?”

The force of the wind abruptly doubled. Lightning flashed all around them, and huge thunderheads were rolling in from all points of the compass. Petter could hear the wind howling through cavities between the trailers.

“I’m sorry, Senator!” Petter shouted over the wind.

But Ruesome wasn’t listening. He was looking to the west, where a steel-grey tentacle had descended from the sky, twisting and twitching until it touched the ground. Petter looked south—and saw two more funnel clouds appear like twins to stab at the earth.

The programmer spun around. On every side, tornadoes were appearing amidst the roiling clouds, first five, then a dozen, and suddenly too many to count, all heading in defiance of the wind right toward them. The noise was deafening—and Petter could now feel through the soles of his feet that unmistakable freight-train rumble of the killer twisters.

Petter had felt all along that he had never quite asked STORMY the right question. Now, suddenly, the question was plain, and he hammered it into the terminal with shaking fingers:

STORMY: FOR WHAT PURPOSE DID YOU BUY ALL THESE TRAILERS?

The answer came back as a single word:

BAIT.

The winds were blowing him to the ground. Petter dropped the terminal and grabbed the Senator by the arm, pulling him toward a nearby culvert where the road crossed a dry creekbed. He shoved the obese man into one three-foot drainpipe, then threw himself into the other.

A moment later, the tornadoes converged on the trailers, all at once. The sound was terrifying. Petter fainted.

Both men lived. Local legend holds that it rained corrugated aluminum in Nebraska for several weeks.

And it was years before another tornado was seen anywhere in the USA.

AI Image Generators, Mon Dieu

Apr 23rd, 2023
by Jeff Duntemann.
9 comments

I finished a 10,700 novelette the other day, the first short fiction I’ve finished since 2008, when I wrote “Sympathy on the Loss of One of Your Legs,” now available in my collection, Souls in Silicon. I’ve mostly written novels and short novels since then. (I’ll have more to say about “Volare” in a future entry here.)

To be published, it needs a cover. I have no objection to paying artists for covers, which apart from an experiment or two (see “Whale Meat”) I’ve always done in the past. Given all the yabbjabber about AI content creation recently, I thought, “Hey, here’s a chance to see if it’s all BS.”

The spoiler: It’s not all BS, but parts of it are BS-ier than others.

Ok. I’ve tested two AI image generators: OpenAI’s DALL-E 2, and Microsft’s Bing Image Generator. I found them through a solid article on ZDNet by Sabrina Ortiz. As it happens, Bing Image Generator outsources the process to DALL-E. I wanted to try Midjourney, and may eventually, but you have to have a paid subscription (about $8/month) to use it.

I’m not going to summarize the story here. One image I wanted to try as a cover would be the female lead sitting with her behind in a wicker basket, floating through the air at dawn a thousand feet or so over Baltimore. In both generators (which are basically the same generator) you feed the AI a detailed text description and turn it loose. I started simple: “A woman flying through the air in a wicker basket.” Edy Gagliano does precisely that in the story. What DALL-E gave me was this:

DALL·E 2023-04-23 14.46.55 - a woman flying through the air in a wicker basket - 500 Wide

Well, the woman is flying through the air, but we have a preposition problem here. She is over, not in the basket. Good first shot, though. I tried various extensions of that basic description, to the tune of 48 images on Dall-E. I won’t post them all here for space reasons, but they ran the gamut: A woman flying through the air holding a basket, a woman flying through the air in a basket the size and shape of a bathtub, and on and on.

The next one here is perhaps the best I’ve gotten from DALL-E. It’s a woman in a basket over Baltimore, I guess. Here’s the description: “a barefoot woman sitting down inside a magical wicker basket that flies through the air at dawn over Baltimore.” In one sense, it’s not a bad picture:

DALL·E 2023-04-23 10.05.40 - a barefoot woman sitting down inside a magical wicker basket that flies through the air at dawn over Baltimore 500 wide

That said, It looks out of focus. The basket is not wicker and it’s yuge. And in the story, Edy just puts her butt in the basket and lets her legs hang over the side.

Now let us move over to Bing Image Generator. In a way, it came closer than nearly all of the DALL-E images. But now we confront a well-known weakness of AI image generators: They can’t draw realistic hands or feet or faces. Here’s my first take on the image from Bing:

_77229ce5-3d7c-4c09-964f-b2b784ba3580 - 500 Wide

Look closely. Her hands and feet appear to be drawn by something that doesn’t know what a human hand or foot looks like. The face, furthermore, looks like it has one eye missing. (That’s easier to see in the full-sized image.)

I’ll give Bing credit: The images are less fuzzy and smeary. Because Bing uses DALL-E, I suspect there are DALL-E settings I don’t know about yet. I tried a few more times and got some reasonable images, all of them including some weirdness or another. The one below is a better rendering of a woman who is actually sitting in the basket with her legs hanging over the basket’s edge. But did I order a helicopter? Her face is a little lopsided, and her hands and feet, while not grotesque, aren’t quite right.

_090cd681-df9a-4736-8fcd-cdaafe028ae1 - 500 wide

Bing gave me about 24 images while I messed with it, and some of the images, while not capturing what I intended, were well-rendered and not full of weirdness. The one below is probably closest to Edy as I imagine her, and we get a SpaceX booster burning up in the atmosphere to boot. Is she over Baltimore? I don’t know Baltimore well enough to be sure, but that, at least, doesn’t matter. Stock photos of anonymous cities are everywhere.

_794c2ce1-7cd6-492d-9712-7e75ab646a3c - 500 wide

None of the others are notable enough to show here.

So where does this leave us? AIs can draw pictures. That’s real, and I’m guessing that if you tell it to draw something a little less loopy than a woman with her butt in a flying basket, it might do a better job. I remain puzzled why hands and feet and faces are so hard to do. Don’t AIs need training? And aren’t there plenty of photos of hands and feet and faces for them to generalize from a substantial number of specific examples?

I have no idea how these things are supposed to work, and if there were a good overview book on AI image generator internals, I’d buy it like a shot. In the meantime, I may practice some more and look at specific settings. If nothing else, I can produce some concept images to show to a cover artist. And maybe I’ll luck into something usable as-is.

Whatever I discover, you can count on seeing it here.

← Earlier Posts