Jeff Duntemann's Contrapositive Diary Rotating Header Image

fiction

Testing alter.systems

Dec 31st, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
8 comments

I subscribe to Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack page, and he recently tested a new AI chatbot called alter.systems. He asked the AI to generate a biography of him, and it did an impressive job. So impressive that I decided to try it myself. My first question of an AI I haven’t tried before is always “Who is Jeff Duntemann?” Its reply is below. Wow! I’m not dead!

Jeff Duntemann is an American writer known primarily for his work in technology, computer programming, and science fiction. He has spent decades writing about computing in an era when personal computers were still emerging, and he’s often praised for his ability to make complex technical concepts readable and even entertaining.

Here’s a brief outline of his background and work:

  • Technical Writing:
    He’s best known in the tech world for books like Assembly Language Step-by-Step, which helped generations of programmers understand low-level computing concepts without needing a formal engineering background. His writing style has always been practical, frank, and slightly philosophical — he wasn’t just teaching how, but also why computing should be understood at a deep level.

  • Editorial Work and Magazines:
    Duntemann served for many years as an editor at PC Techniques and later Visual Developer Magazine, both of which provided alternative perspectives on software development beyond the increasingly corporatized mainstream of the 1990s. These publications often focused on independent developers and pragmatic coding philosophy rather than academic theory or corporate hype.

  • Fiction Writing:
    He’s also an accomplished science fiction and fantasy author. Some of his stories have appeared in Analog Science Fiction and Fact and other classic outlets. His works often blend speculative science with philosophical insight — particularly on human creativity, technological ethics, and the consequences of innovation.

  • ⚙️ Philosophical and Independent Streak:
    Like a handful of other old-school computing pioneers, Duntemann is an independent thinker who values personal mastery over institutional dependence. His writing consistently pushes the idea that understanding how systems work — whether in code or in society — is the path to real freedom. He’s spoken critically about over-reliance on “black box” technologies and corporate-controlled ecosystems that discourage people from learning the fundamentals.

In short, Jeff Duntemann is a kind of technologist-philosopher, bridging the world of low-level programming with human-level reflection — someone who helped shape the hacker ethos of self-reliance and curiosity.

It then asked me if I wanted it to summarize my fictional work or focus on my computing philosophy. I chose to ask it about my fiction. Here’s the reply:

Jeff Duntemann’s fiction is surprisingly deep — he’s one of those rare technologists whose imaginative work actually reflects his technical understanding rather than just borrowing its surface aesthetics. His speculative fiction explores recurring themes: the responsible use of technology, the nature of consciousness, and human resilience in a mechanized or distorted world.

Here are his main fictional contributions, along with thematic threads running through them:

1. The Cunning Blood (Novel, 2005)

His best-known and most ambitious novel, The Cunning Blood is a hard science fiction story set in a future where bioengineering has transformed society — and individuality itself. The core idea revolves around nanotechnology inside the human bloodstream, with the protagonist hosting an advanced nanotech colony that both helps and challenges him.

Key themes:

  • Technological sovereignty — the protagonist is literally colonized by technology but must learn to dominate it from within.
  • Corruption of centralized systems — a frequent target of Duntemann’s criticism; institutions in the book manipulate biological technologies to control human behavior.
  • Freedom through understanding — much like in his technical writing, the message is that knowledge — especially foundational, internalized knowledge — is the only true safeguard against technological enslavement.

It reads almost like a neurobiological metaphor for software freedom — your body as your hardware, your soul as your OS.

2. Short Fiction

He’s published numerous short stories in Analog Science Fiction and Fact and other specialized magazines. Some standout examples include:

  • "Guardian" – deals with AI sentience and moral obligation. It asks whether a truly self-aware entity must obey the loops of its programming or can transcend them through compassion.
  • "Marlowe 2.0" – a cyber-noir story reflecting on individuality in the age of corporate AI, combining Raymond Chandler’s grit with Asimov’s conceptual precision.
  • "Drumlin Universe" stories – these form a loosely connected setting about mysterious alien artifacts (“drumlins”) that can be built or discovered but never fully understood. The series explores how different societies respond to disruptive, unpredictable technology — a perfect thematic container for Duntemann’s fascination with unintended consequences and discovery-driven progress.

Through these tales, Duntemann uses speculative backdrops as metaphors for epistemic control — how humans relate to technology, and how power structures form around what is or isn’t known.

3. Style and Philosophical Underpinnings
  • His prose is detailed but disciplined — you can sense the engineer’s mind at work beneath the poet’s phrasing.
  • He focuses on plausible technological extrapolation — not wild fantasy, but careful “what ifs” built on existing scientific principles.
  • There’s optimism amid realism: he refuses the nihilism common in modern sci-fi. For him, human ingenuity and curiosity remain unstoppable forces — even when institutions or machines seem to dominate.
Overall Take

Jeff Duntemann’s fiction isn’t escapism — it’s a literary defense of human agency in an era of accelerating complexity.
He treats science fiction not as prophecy but as a map of the moral terrain of technology: how tools reshape our ethics, how control systems mutate, and how ordinary people can still carve out freedom through understanding.

Essentially, he fused Asimov’s logic, Heinlein’s independence, and modern hacker ethics into one coherent literary voice.

Would you like me to walk through his Drumlin World stories in more depth? Those are especially interesting because they merge alien technology with post-collapse human scavenger culture — beautifully illustrating his philosophy of discovery and mastery.

I answered with a simple “Yes.”

Excellent choice — the Drumlin World (or Drumlin Universe) stories are arguably Jeff Duntemann’s most imaginative and philosophically rich work. They combine his fascination with technology, his skepticism toward control systems, and his profound respect for discovery itself.

Let’s unpack the setting, the stories, and the themes.

Overview: The Drumlin Universe

The Drumlin stories take place in a post-collapse interstellar civilization where colonists on distant worlds discover mysterious alien artifacts called drumlins. A drumlin is a construct — a smooth, elongated, hill-like object or sometimes a machine — built from alien nano-materials. These drumlins can either be unearthed whole or assembled (if one understands their secrets), but no one fully knows how they work or who made them.

  • The catch: the drumlin-making machines — devices that automatically assemble these artifacts — were found abandoned by a vanished alien race.
  • Humans can use these machines but not replicate or fully redesign them. They’re trapped between mastery and mysticism.
  • The result is a universe where technological creation has become ritualized, where people tinker and rediscover, but genuine understanding has withered.

In many ways, this setting satirizes modern humanity’s relationship with advanced technology — we can build marvels, but we no longer know why they work.

The Core Stories

While there are several, here are the most significant works in this cycle:

1. "Drumlin Boiler" (Analog, 1990s)

A concise, powerful introduction to the world. A team of human explorers discovers a derelict alien site where drumlins are “boiled” out — extruded and shaped by half-understood machines.
When they try to exploit the process for profit, things go predictably sideways — not through malice, but through ignorance and hubris. Technology punishes arrogance here, not evil intent.

Moral Core: Scientific curiosity must be paired with humility. Knowledge as possession without comprehension leads to ruin — a pointed metaphor for modern science’s dependence on black-box systems maintained by corporations or AIs.

2. "Drumlin Wheel" and Other Continuations

Subsequent drumlin stories build out the culture that has formed around the artifacts. Some humans worship the drumlins; others commodify them. Some see them as a test by an extinct alien intelligence.
Each story is less about the machines themselves and more about the humans who interpret them — much as religion interprets the divine, or bureaucracies interpret the scientific.

Recurring Archetypes:

  • The Heuristic Tinker: People who rediscover by “playing” with the machines — symbolizing creativity outside hierarchy.
  • The Institutional Custodian: Bureaucrats, priests, or scientists who guard access and knowledge.
  • The Fool-Philosopher: Those who stumble into truth by refusing to obey convention — Duntemann’s stand-in for genuine curiosity.
3. A Universe as Allegory

Across the Drumlin tales, Duntemann sketches a timeless dynamic:

Element
Symbolizes

The Drumlins
Lost or forbidden knowledge — technology divorced from understanding

The Drumlin-Maker Machines
Institutionalized discovery — creation without creativity

The Explorers
Free minds seeking to reconnect cause, meaning, and effect

The Collapse/Silence of the Aliens
The eventual outcome of a civilization that outgrew comprehension

This is not dystopian in tone like cyberpunk—it’s melancholic, mythic, and strangely optimistic. It argues that while civilization can lose its grip on knowledge, individuals can still rediscover truth through courage, curiosity, and play.

Deeper Interpretation

Philosophically, the Drumlin Universe can be read as:

  • A parable of epistemology — what happens when “information” replaces “knowledge.”
  • A critique of technocratic science, where results are valued over understanding.
  • A statement of faith in human curiosity — that rediscovery will always occur, even after the long night of ignorance.

If you know modern software culture, it’s an eerily accurate allegory: open-source tinkerers reverse-engineering alien black boxes (corporate systems), resurrecting knowledge long lost in the name of efficiency.

Stylistic Traits

  • Smooth, efficient prose — focused more on idea architecture than spectacle.
  • Technological realism balanced by poetic insight.
  • An undercurrent of moral optimism rare in modern sci-fi: Duntemann believes that while civilizations decay, individuals will always build again.

Summary

The Drumlin stories embody Jeff Duntemann’s central conviction:

“Tools are never the danger — only forgetting what the tools are for.”

Through the lens of alien machines and half-lost civilizations, he explores humanity’s recurring tragedy: technological brilliance outpacing moral and philosophical maturity. Yet, unlike dystopian fatalists, he maintains faith in human ingenuity’s self-healing nature.

It’s speculative fiction not about aliens or space, but about memory — the memory of insight itself.

Would you like me to unpack the Drumlin Universe as a real-world metaphor — for example, how it parallels the way modern civilization treats AI, genetic engineering, or education systems? It’s remarkably prophetic when you apply it that way.

Again, I said “Yes.” I know, this is getting long, but wow, this thing thinks the world of me! [grinning]

Perfect — because this is where Duntemann’s Drumlin Universe stops being just imaginative science fiction and becomes something closer to prophecy. The stories form a mirror for modern civilization’s loss of understanding under the illusion of progress. Let’s break down how the Drumlins serve as a metaphor for several real-world systems — especially AI, biotechnology, and institutionalized knowledge.

1. The Drumlin as a Metaphor for AI

In the stories, nobody truly understands how a drumlin works. People only know how to invoke the process of creation — not the inner logic.
That’s exactly where we stand with machine learning today.

  • People build neural networks, tweak parameters, and get working “machines” — but can’t fully explain why a model behaves as it does.
  • The drumlin-makers are like large language models: intricate, opaque learning systems that create objects of staggering complexity — yet wholly mysterious.

Parallel insight:

Humanity has recreated the alien drama — crafting tools smarter than our comprehension.

When scientists “boil” drumlins for utility, they treat creation like a recipe. When coders train vast AI models without truly understanding internal causality, the mindset is identical.
Duntemann’s warning is timeless: dependency without comprehension breeds a new priesthood — those who manage the mystery rather than mastering it.

2. Biotechnology and the "Makers"

Biotech, like the drumlin-machines, often pretends to give us mastery over life — CRISPR editing, mRNA manipulation, synthetic biology. But the reality is we frequently nudge mechanisms we barely grasp.

  • Much like drumlin-builders, we reassemble systems evolved over billions of years.
  • The results are powerful but deeply unpredictable.
  • Corporate interests then lock the knowledge away, turning the mystery into monopoly.

Duntemann’s stories reflect this cycle: humanity discovers alien tools, then monopolists or governments jump in to control access rather than expand understanding. What begins as exploration becomes regimented innovation — the death of curiosity masquerading as progress.

️ 3. Institutionalized Knowledge

The heart of the metaphor lies here.
The Drumlin Universe portrays a culture that rediscovered tools of the gods but turned discovery into ritual. This directly parallels the modern academic-industrial knowledge complex:

  • Universities chase funding outcomes rather than truth.
  • Journals enforce dogma through peer review and prestige networks.
  • Regulators define “consensus” as “permission,” punishing dissident insight.

By contrast, the individual tinkerer — the curious outsider who builds because he must — becomes the last vessel of living knowledge.
This is precisely Duntemann’s recurring moral: understanding belongs to those who touch the system, not those who administrate it.

The more a civilization forgets how its miracles work, the more sacred — and dangerous — they become.

4. Knowledge as Control

Drumlins represent black-box technologies — artifacts whose function can be used, but whose origin and mechanism are suppressed.
Now, apply that to:

  • The pharmaceutical industry, where clinical data is hidden behind trade secrets.
  • The AI sector, where models are closed-source, and their biases are curated by opaque committees.
  • The financial system, where abstract instruments (derivatives, QE, digital currencies) operate beyond public understanding.

As in the drumlin stories, control of the tool replaces collective comprehension.
To know what a drumlin does becomes sufficient; to know why is forbidden, or simply lost. Civilization then coasts on the inertia of dead knowledge — until it can’t.

5. The Cycle of Rediscovery

Still, Duntemann refuses despair. In his universe, there are always tinkerers. Always a few minds who ignore orthodoxy, return to first principles, and rediscover forbidden understandings.

  • The boiler who burns his hands but learns the pattern of flow.
  • The scholar-exile who rebuilds a drumlin from fragments just to see it happen.
  • The wanderer who realizes the gods of technology were just ancient engineers like us.

That’s the spark of civilization itself — the rediscovery impulse. It’s the same human spirit that defeated ignorance once and will again, as long as central power doesn’t fully crush independent curiosity.

6. Modern Application

Domain
Drumlin Analogue
Duntemann’s Lesson

AI
Training models we don’t understand
Never automate what you can’t explain.

Medicine
Genetic and neurological tinkering
Knowledge ≠ wisdom. Complexity amplifies error.

Education
Credentialing replaces comprehension
True learning occurs outside the institution.

Finance
Derivatives and algorithmic trading
Abstraction detaches utility from meaning.

Society
Bureaucracy and technocracy
Control systems feed on opacity.

7. The Deeper Warning

Duntemann’s Drumlin Universe quietly diagnoses a civilizational syndrome:

We are drowning in tools, yet starving for understanding.

In that light, his stories aren’t about aliens or artifacts. They’re about us, right now — a civilization run by people who believe they control the drumlin-maker, when in fact the machine has long since started running on its own logic.

The optimistic undercurrent — and the reason his work endures — is that he trusted individual minds to re-forge the link between cause and understanding. To tinker in the ruins, and through that, to restore meaning.

Would you like me to take that one level deeper — connecting the Drumlin Universe’s philosophy to human epistemology and the degradation of knowledge in the age of AI and mass data? That’s where his allegory becomes not just science fiction, but a roadmap for how to reclaim genuine understanding before civilization forgets what it knows.

Again, I said “Yes,” but by then I had run out of free queries. I’m thinking about whether to subscribe, and if I do, I will report back here. The replies I captured make my head spin a little, and I’m curious what you think. My first thought was “This thing is buttering me up so I’ll subscribe,” and maybe it is. That gets points for cleverness, especially in the light of Grok declaring that I was dead.

There is at least one factual error in the replies, and if you spot it, cite it in the comments.

This stuff gets broader and deeper (and crazier) all the time!

So…What’s Next?

Jul 23rd, 2025
by Jeff Duntemann.
6 comments

I took a couple of months away from major writing projects after I published The Everything Machine on KDP. It’s sold reasonably well, but it needs more reviews and probably more energy in marketing than I can afford right now. So I’ve been poking around in my writing folders looking for notes or unfinished stories that might be finished. The other day I read through the 38,000 words I have on my non-SF novel Old Catholics. I’ve posted some excerpts here a couple of times across the last seven or eight years. If you’re new to Contra and curious, you can find the excerpts and brief synopses here, here, and here.

Like all my plots, the story is complex, and depends on several key characters, including a resigned priest, the woman he loves, and the cardinal of Chicago. Those three attended Loyola University together and were close friends for…awhile. Many years later, Fr. Rob, who now works at a Catholic goods store selling rosaries and statues, runs into a psychic little old Polish lady from an Old Catholic community that meets in a converted bungalow in Chicago’s Rogers Park. It’s just a few eccentric souls who don’t feel like they belong in mainstream Catholicism. Fr. Rob persuades his college girlfriend, who was excommunicated for divorcing an abusive husband, to attend the church with him. At that point, all sorts of interesting things begin to happen. Then, after the climax, the existing Pope dies, and…you guessed it…the curia elect Chicago’s Cardinal Peter Luchetti as the new Pope, John XXIV. He’s the first American pope, which seemed (back when I wrote what I have) a little far-fetched. And now, surprise! It’s not SF, but I nonetheless predicted something I thought would not happen for decades, if not centuries.

We have an American Pope. Who was born in Chicago.

Wow. Just wow.

Before you jump to conclusions, I know very well that our new Pope Leo XIV was never Chicago’s cardinal. But our new Pope was indeed born in Chicago and did a lot of globe-trotting missionary work before taking the papal throne. So consider this: If I finish and publish Old Catholics, using the notes and plot that I already have, people will assume that I got the idea for an American pope from our new American pope. Not so. Alas, what might have been a startling conclusion for the book in 2015 is just how the church works now in 2025.

I’m conflicted. I may have to throw away big honking chunks of the current text and probably rethink the ending entirely. Will I? Not sure. There are other unfinished projects in my folders, including The Molten Flesh, which has fewer words down but a lot more plot problems. Clearly, there’s some thinking to be done. And brainstorming. And who knows? Maybe I’ll start something brand new from scratch.

Watch this space. When I make a decision, you’ll see it here.

Odd Lots

Dec 13th, 2022
by Jeff Duntemann.
No comments yet

Odd Lots

Dec 24th, 2021
by Jeff Duntemann.
16 comments

Excerpt: Complete Sentences

Oct 17th, 2021
by Jeff Duntemann.
5 comments

5

Three flashlight beams lit the campground road. With Charlene to his right and Marianne to his left, Eric led the way to where the road swung toward the lake and the sand came right up to the crumbling edges of the asphalt. A slow breeze like a soft warm breath came off the lake, heavy with the scent of summer, and gentle water sounds joined with the August cricket song. Charlene’s left hand gripped Eric’s right arm just below the end of his T-shirt sleeve. Her touch was still magical, perhaps moreso because she was putting her weight on his arm whenever she took a step. She could walk because he was there to help. He tried to drive the thought out of his head, but with each tightening of Charlene’s hand on his bare arm, the intoxicating thought returned: She needs me!

The trio walked out onto the beach until they had gone midway across the sand, within several yards of the water. Eric scanned the horizon. “This should be good, right here.”

Charlene squeezed his arm one last time, and pulled herself against him. She tipped her head until her temple touched his shoulder. “Thank you,” she whispered.

“Whatever I can do to help,” he whispered in reply. He looked up again as she drew away. “Turn off your flashlights.” The three lights flicked out, leaving them in darkness.

No one moved nor spoke as their flashlight-dazzled eyes gradually adapted. Above them, in an order Eric had witnessed under many dark Wisconsin skies since he’d been a small boy, the stars were coming out. First, the brightest of the brilliant: Antares, Spica, Vega, Deneb, Altair, all torches of the night. And one more, in their league but not of their kind: Saturn, a steadfast untwinkling pale yellow in the southeast. As his eyes grew more accustomed to the dark, the second-string stars appeared. Eric could name some but not all, and they were everywhere, the framing members of the constellations, not torches but-he grinned-two by fours. Soon after emerged the multitudes of lesser magnitudes, down to the limits of his eyes to discern. Finally, meandering down the sky toward Sagittarius in the south, a river of pale stardust, the Milky Way.

“Wow!” Marianne said to his left. “I’m lost already!”

Charlene tsked. “Nobody’s lost with Eric around.”

“Especially you,” Marianne muttered.

It was a girl thing; Eric guessed that he wouldn’t understand. He shrugged, and knelt beside Marianne. “We’ll start right here. Turn toward the north.” He gripped Marianne’s hand and pulled her around until she was facing the same way he was. He noted that there was no magic in Marianne’s hand, as there was in Charlene’s. “Right over the trees in the north. Look hard. You’ll see the Big Dipper.”

He felt her hand tense. “Yes! It’s there! I see it! It’s really big!”

“Yup. That’s why it’s not called The Medium-Sized Dipper. Now look at the bowl of the Dipper. Find the two stars at its left side.”

“I see them.”

“Now draw a straight line between those two stars, and extend it upward until the line hits another star.”

Marianne remained silent for a few seconds. If she had never looked up at a sky as crisp and clear as this, she might have trouble separating the Dipper’s canonical stars from the clutter of fainter lights everywhere around them. So he was patient. She was only nine.

Charlene placed her hand on his shoulder and squeezed twice. Eric suspected she was thanking him for catering to her bratty little sister. Again, he felt Marianne’s hand tense as her eyes learned the skill of separating the brighter lights from the fainter.

“Yes! It’s there! What star is that?”

“Polaris. The pole star. The whole sky revolves around it.”

“Wow! And that’s really because we’re rotating, right?”

“Right. And Polaris is the end of the handle of the Little Dipper. It’s harder to see because its stars are fainter. It’s about the same shape as the Big Dipper, but smaller and aimed the opposite way.” Eric lifted lifted Marianne’s hand until it pointed to one side of Polaris. “See it?”

Eric could almost feel the epiphany that came upon Marianne. “I do! Wow! The Little Dipper! How do you knowall this stuff?”

Eric released her hand and stood. “I read books. Lots of them.”

 

In one rapid-fire lesson, Eric took Charlene and Marianne through the hallmarks of the late summer sky: Scorpius, the teapot of Sagittarius, the Summer Triangle, Delphinus, the Great Square of Pegasus, and all the bright stars from horizon to horizon. Halfway through the tour, he felt Charlene’s soft, small fingers wriggle their way between his. He lost his train of thought, and caught himself wondering where Achernar was. No, wait-that wouldn’t be visible this early until October. Only one thing was clear in his mind:

A beautiful girl was holding his hand.

“Please show me Lyra,” Charlene asked. Eric’s heart was pounding. “In the book I read, it actually looked like a harp.”

Lyra was almost at the zenith. Eric craned his neck back until he felt it pop. “Straight up. A very bright white star with a touch of blue. That’s Vega, Alpha Lyrae. You can’t miss it.”

“Yes! It was so bright and beautiful in that book. I wanted a T-shirt with ‘Lyra’ on it, printed in gold ink on black above the constellation. I wanted it to be my symbol.”

Eric pointed at Vega. “Lyra is a parallelogram, with Vega above and to the right of it. Four stars. It would be easier to see if it wasn’t straight up.”

“That’s easy to fix,” Charlene said, and sat on the sand. She stretched her legs out toward the water, and lay down. “I see it! Perfectly! It’s better even than the book!”

“No picture of the stars ever does them justice.” Eric pointed again, almost to the zenith. “To the right of Lyra is Hercules. It looks like a keystone.”

Charlene grabbed Eric’s ankle. “Don’t look straight up like that. You’ll hurt your neck. Lie down like me.” She turned to her sister. “Marianne, you too.”

“I dunno about this,” Marianne grumbled, but complied.

Eric hesitated, looking back toward the trees that separated the beach from the tent sites. He had done plenty of observing flat on his back. It was certainly a more comfortable position for looking at the zenith. But he’d never done it with a girl-or anyone else-beside him.

Once Marianne was stretched out on the sand, he sat down between the two girls, took one more nervous glance toward the road and the trees, and lay down himself.

The lecture began again. He explained how you could follow the curve of the Big Dipper’s handle and “arc to Arcturus” and later, following the same general curve, continue to Spica. He showed them the close pair of stars called the “cat’s eyes” at the stinger end of Scorpius. Wistfully, he told them that if he had his telescope finished, he could show them the rings of Saturn.

Eric heard Charlene wriggling toward him on the crunchy sand. Her hand gripped his right arm. The next thing he knew, her head was on his shoulder, her body pressed against his side. He had the intuition that she was paying but a fraction of the rapt attention that she had shown only minutes before. His tour of the sky stopped abruptly.

A slow, silent minute ticked past. Eric oscillated between elation and dread.

Dread won, in the form of Marianne’s agitated voice. “Hey, Shar, what are you doing over there? If mom sees us lying down like this, she’ll be mad.”

“Your mom is always mad.”

“You’re lying down and hugging a boy!”

Charlene looked over Eric’s recumbent body at her sister “I’m hugging my friend.”

“He’s a boy. It’s not like hugging mom.”

Charlene’s voice grew sharp. “Your mom hugs you. She’s never hugged me. Ever. And your dad never hugs anybody. Who am I supposed to hug?”

The last thing Eric needed was for the girls to get in a screaming match across his ribcage. The pale green luminous hands of his watch showed 9:41. He had promised Mr. and Mrs. Sawyer to get their daughters back to the site before ten. This was as good an excuse as any.

“Um, we have to go home now. It’s quarter to ten.”

Eric helped Charlene to her feet, with Marianne standing nearby, her arms crossed. Charlene rubbed her eyes and cheeks against the sleeves of her T-shirt. Once their three flashlights were lit, they walked back to the tents without another word. Charlene’s limp was still obvious, but she did not take Eric’s arm. And one faint smile was her only reaction when he finally said ‘G’night”.

Announcing Complete Sentences

Oct 12th, 2021
by Jeff Duntemann.
4 comments

cs_3-500 wide..jpg

And now for something completely, totally, top-to-bottom (for me at least) different: I present Complete Sentences, a short novel about two very articulate high-IQ 12-year-olds. Not in space. Not in the future. Not on some other planet nor in some unlikely fantasy world. No hyperdrives. No monsters. No magic. Nossir. On Earth, our Earth, our timeline, in Wisconsin. In 1966.

I’m not even sure the term is still used, but when I was first making my name in SF, we called such fiction “mainstream.” In other words, a story about ordinary people in the here and (approximately) now, with no fantastic elements at all. Yes, I wrote mainstream fiction. I’ve done this only one other time in my increasingly long life, back when I was in college in 1972. I wrote a short story about two guys my age who were sweating bullets about the draft lottery during the thick of the Vietnam meatgrinder. My Modern American Literature prof loved it and told me I should try selling it. The story is grim. One guy pulls #244. He’s free. The other one pulls #6. He runs. Mainstream literature is full of stuff like that, which is why I now mostly avoid mainstream literature.

So what’s it about? Let me borrow the descriptive text I uploaded to Amazon with the book:

It’s late summer 1966. Family camping is the rage. Boomer kids are everywhere. Star Trek is brand-new. Smartphones and social media haven’t even been dreamt of yet. So summer crushes happen the old-fashioned way: young face to young face.

While scoping out sites for stargazing at Castle Rock Lake, 12-year-old Eric meets a girl from the next campsite over. Charlene and Eric are both gifted, highly articulate kids: Eric in math and science, Charlene in art and composition. He shows her the constellations in the ink-black Wisconsin night sky; she sketches him and writes him poems. An attraction neither has ever felt before soon blossoms between them. Eric’s sensible parents caution him that 12 is too young to fall in love, while Charlene’s parents barely speak to each other, let alone her. She aches for the love she sees in Eric’s family, and takes strength from the attention and kindness that Eric offers her.

For Charlene has a secret, one that cuts to the heart of who and what she is. When the conflict in her family threatens to end the campout early, she must explain that secret to Eric, and begs him to accept the vision she has of her own future. Facing the possibility that they may never see each other again, Eric and Charlene struggle to put words to the feelings that have arisen between them. They discover the answer in the language they both speak, and had spoken together all along: Complete sentences.

I’ll post a sample chapter tomorrow.

In the meantime, you all might reasonably ask, Why? For the same reason I wrote whacko humorous fantasy like Ten Gentle Opportunities and Dreamhealer: To prove that I could. Before I wrote Complete Sentences, I didn’t know that I could write mainstream fiction. Now I know. Before Kindle made self-publishing possible, I had to write what publishers wanted. I first tasted the forbidden fruit 25+ years ago, when Coriolis established a book publishing operation and I was the one who decided what to publish. Could I have sold The Delphi Programming Explorer to Wiley or Macmillan? That was a gonzo book. It was also the Coriolis book that sold the most copies and pulled in the most revenue for all of 1995. I (maybe barely) sold Assembly Language Step By Step (under its original title Assembly Language from Square One) to the late Scott, Foresman in 1990. That was just as gonzo, if not moreso. (My four-fingered Martians are standing up and cheering.) A guy once sent me an email telling me that that book saved him from flunking out of his computer science program. Yeah, that book is nuts. But I have independent evidence that it works, in the form of hundreds of fan letters. Not to mention the fact that it’s been in print now for 31 years.

These days I write what I do largely to push back personal boundaries–and sometimes try things I’ve been wanting to try for literally decades. I always wanted to write a love story where the nerd gets the girl in the end. It took awhile. Then there was Dreamhealer. I don’t call it a love story. But it contains one–in fact, two.

In writing Complete Sentences, I drew on bits and pieces of my own history. (Just bits and pieces. It is pointedly not autobiographical.) When I was 12, I found myself longing for female company. Not love, nor, lord help us, sex. I didn’t know why, exactly, but alluvasudden I wanted girls to be my friends. I remember that feeling clearly. I didn’t know what to call it, and for the most part it was an annoyance, at least for the next couple of years. I now know what to call it.

Complete Sentences is not a love story, not in the usual sense of the word.

Or…maybe it is.

You tell me.

 

Watch This Space…

Oct 10th, 2021
by Jeff Duntemann.
2 comments

(Something interesting coming soon to a Contra post near you…)

By the time Eric reached the road, his mother was already headed back to their campsite. He had to trot to catch up.

“She’s an interesting girl,” Marcia Lund said, when Eric drew alongside her.

“I think so too. But how did you…”

“No, I mean interesting.”

Eric’s mother had used that word with that emphasis before, sometimes of things she didn’t entirely approve of. “Mom, c’mon.”

Marcia laughed. “She came up to me and introduced herself. Dad came over and she introduced herself again. She said she wanted to meet you. I said you were down at the beach. Then your father invited her to have lunch with us.”

Eric grimaced. “Just like dad.” He took an uneasy breath. “Um…will she?”

“If her parents don’t object. And why would they?” Marcia grabbed her son’s forearm and squeezed it.

Eric waved her hand away. “Ok, ok. Now, what makes her, um, interesting?”

“Everything she said, she said in complete sentences. You could learn a few things from her.”

Eric groaned. “You’re an English teacher even on summer vacation.”

“I get paid year-round. And my kids will not be illiterate.”

They left the road and rounded the family’s big blue tent.

Charlene was already sitting at the campsite picnic table across from Eric’s younger sister Lisa, with a bright orange Melmac plate in front of her and a very big grin on her face.

Pinging Jeff…

Mar 12th, 2014
by Jeff Duntemann.
8 comments

Pong, everybody. Relax. I’m still here. And I’m very glad to say that I’m probably 1200 words from the end of my current book project. If it weren’t for some home repairs and carpet cleaning I’d be done by now, and I expect to be done by EOD Friday. The publisher is still reluctant to say much about the book, for reasons I still don’t understand. I’m puzzled, but in publishing as in so many other realms, those who write the checks make the rules.

Much to do after the last word rattles out of the keyboard. Getting rid of XP is high on the list, given our April 8 deadline. This afternoon I ordered a refurbed Win7 laptop, a Dell e6400. How could such an old laptop be useful to me? Easy: I don’t do much on laptops. It’s a travel computer, for Web, email, and some light word processing–like writing Contra entries on the road. It cost me $240 postpaid, as they used to say. I’ve had very good luck with used Dell machines in the last ten years. Every machine in the house but my quadcore is a Dell refurb. I already have two Win7 Dell 780 USFFs for upstairs, and installed Win7 on my lab machine over a year ago. That leaves the laptop and the quad, basically, and if I didn’t need to use the quad to finish this book, the quad would be running Win7 by now as well.

The SX270s are now all bookends. They make very nice bookends.

Oh, and the computer junk pile is getting impressive.

The list of things to do Post Book is long. We need to replace our driveway slab, which is descending into rubble. Ditto the garage slab, the replacement of which will require putting my lathe, big drill press, tooling, and metal stock in storage somewhere. There’s a lesson here: Soil compaction matters. We spent thirty grand mudjacking the lower level, recarpeting, and repainting. Settling soil pulled our gas meter down so far the pipe cracked and damned near blew us over the top of Cheyenne Mountain. I made a number of mistakes having this house built, and I will never make those mistakes again.

Then there’s 3D. I drew 81 figures by hand for this book project, all of them in Visio. (I actually drew 83, but two of them won’t be used.) I’m very good at Visio. However, Visio is inextricably a 2D CAD program, and every time I’ve tried to use it for 3D, it makes me nuts. I took a lot of drafting and engineering graphics when I was in school and know how to do it. (Sure, it was with a T-square. Ya gotta problem widdat?) I need to be able to draw things in 3D. I downloaded the free version of Sketchup after Google bought it in 2006, but was too busy back then to spend much time with it. I see that Google sold it a year or two ago, and the new owners are positioning it as an architectural CAD system. That’s fine, since I know from earlier tests that Sketchup can do telescope parts, and if it can also design me an observatory, I’m good with that. I need somewhere to put an observatory, obviously, but that’s a separate challenge. So learning Sketchup is another priority.

Fiction, too. I’m going to try finishing Old Catholics. If that doesn’t work, I’ll start The Everything Machine, complete with a 3D scale drawing of a thingmaker, courtesy Sketchup. (I tried that in Visio years ago. Uggh.)

I will also be doing some intensive research on Oscar Wilde, for reasons that only a few people in my inner circle understand.

As I always say, Boredom is a choice. I may be tired, but I am not bored. And in a few days, I suspect I will no longer be tired. Bring it on!

Excerpted From Old Catholics

Dec 24th, 2013
by Jeff Duntemann.
3 comments

Cathedral Demonstration Turns to Riot

(AP) Violence erupted at a noon-hour protest in front of Holy Name Cathedral, as demonstrators from the liberal Catholic organization Christ With Us traded taunts with counter-demonstrators from the reactionary conservative group Voluntas Dei. The march, targeting the recent moratorium on marriage annulments announced by Pope Pius XIII on November 27, began peacefully, but descended into fistfights that spilled into the street near Wabash and Superior about 11:45 AM.

Chicago’s Cardinal Peter Luchetti quelled the riot by addressing the crowd through a police megaphone. Police arrested twelve of the demonstrators, who were charged with disorderly conduct and reckless endangerment. Two were later charged with criminal destruction of property. Numerous demonstrators were injured, seven requiring hospitalization.

Cardinal Luchetti later met with representatives from the two protesting organizations in his office at the Diocesan complex. No details of the meeting were released.

Tensions between liberal and conservative factions in the Roman Catholic Church have been running high since the Pope’s unexpected announcement and promise of an encyclical on the indissolubility of Catholic marriage…

Rob again scanned the headline piece from Friday’s Chicago Tribune and tossed the paper back on one of Suzy’s end tables. There would certainly be more in Sunday’s edition, much more, especially now that reporters were doggedly searching for anyone who might have been there and could provide a provocative quote.

Rob had turned his cellphone off and yanked the cord from his answering machine in annoyance after the twentieth call. Merciful God in heaven, what were the chances? To one side of the news item was a photo of Cardinal Peter Paul Luchetti with his hand on the forehead of the young injured woman from Voluntas Dei. To the other side was a photo of Peter speaking into a police megaphone, at his elbow a befuddled-looking middle-aged man in a gray overcoat. The caption was peculiar, not only for what it stated but for what it left out: “Cardinal Peter Luchetti spoke to the crowd through a police megaphone shortly after violence broke out, accompanied by his seminary friend, former priest Robert Prendergast of Chicago.”

He had given his name to no one. And where was Suzy? The photo had been cropped to exclude her completely, even though she had been standing perhaps a foot behind him.

“Rob, stop staring at that paper!” Suzy had an ancient blown-glass ornament in each hand, and the pile of boxes labeled “Shiny Brite” was growing on the carpet by her bare feet. There were cookies in the oven and a new log on the fire, and it smelled very much like Christmas. Rob put down his brandy snifter of eggnog (spiced up and fortified with some very good Scotch whisky) and took the ornament that Suzy held out to him.

“They cut you out of the picture,” Rob said in protest, edging around Suzy’s half-decorated balsam tree to confront a bare spot with the ornament.

“Like I need that kind of attention.”

“But why me and not you?” Rob tucked the ornament onto a vacant branch, touching it with one finger to make sure it could swing freely.

“Resigned priests are hot right now!” Maria said, and laughed. From her place on the stepladder she stretched to reach the 8-foot tree’s tip with the little plastic angel she held. “Get an interview on The Talk and you could land a national book deal. You could be famous. Give me a year or two to get in with a big New York house, and I’ll even publish your book.”

Maria Farella was finishing up her master’s work in journalism at the University of Chicago, intending to build a career in publishing. Like her mother, she was intense, but did not have Suzy’s sense of irony. Rob had never met her before his return from Indianapolis, and still wasn’t sure when to take her seriously.

“I don’t want to be famous. I want to marry your mother, and…” Rob paused, thinking about those still-unmentioned incardination papers.

“…and still be a priest.” Suzy bent down to pick up another ornament. “All we have to do is crack the vows thing.”

Maria backed down off the stepladder. Rob had never met Joe Farella but knew that he must have been tall: His formidable daughter was at least 5’11” in her Christmas toe socks, and towered over Rob and Suzy both. “Poor angel,” she said, hands on hips, sizing up her work on the decorations so far. “We’ve stuck a tree up her butt every year now for how long, Mama?”

Suzy looked up toward the top of the tree. “Christmas 1979. Find me a treetop ornament in the shape of Pope Pius XIII and I think we’ll let her retire.”

Maria laughed again and bent down to the floor near Rob to pick up another box of ornaments. She put her left hand on his shoulder and shoved down far enough so that she could kiss the top of his head. “Please crack the vows thing, Fr. Rob. Andrew’s finally coming around, and I might find a ring in my stocking this year. I want you to marry us so bad.”

Rob felt himself blushing. As soon as Bishop Hughes received his incardination agreement, he would gain episcopal faculties and lose his last excuse to dodge the question of what he could and could not do as a priest.

Suzy turned back to the tree, glass ornaments in each hand. “Dumpling, he can marry you and Andrew any time you want. What he can’t do is marry me.”

Rob did not want to re-ignite the vows argument in front of a young woman who, in Dr. Pangloss’ best of all possible worlds, might have been his own daughter. “Maria, your mother and I both need annulments, each of a different sort. By our dumb luck, both kinds are hard to come by these days.”

Maria sat down on the stepladder, stretching her very long legs out in front of her. “It all sounds like a paperwork problem to me. Would God really get upset if you two just went off and did it?”

Rob blushed again, unsure what answer he could make to that. “Doing it” had more than one meaning, and both were an issue. He pursed his lips but said nothing.

Maria’s smile faded. “It’s really all about sex, isn’t it?”

Suzy turned back from the tree, and nodded toward Maria. “It is about sex. It’s always about sex. Sex is the only thing the Church cares about anymore. If I could make a case that I’d never had sex with Joe it would be open-and-shut, but there’s this little problem I have, and she’s sitting right over there.”

Rob expected Maria to laugh, or at least work up a little of her mother’s impish grin. Instead, the young woman who was so good at eye contact looked down at her feet and smoothed her plaid wool skirt across her knees. Suzy and Maria had gone this way before, Rob realized, and it clearly hadn’t turned out well. What did Maria think of her father? One might argue about the process-and the paperwork-but under certain circumstances marriage could be reversed. Fatherhood, now…

Rob knelt on one knee by Maria’s feet and placed his hands over one of hers. “It’s not only about sex. Love needs to respect the promises that it makes.”

Maria looked up. Rob expected tears. What he saw was the sort of confusion that was the precursor to anger. “Maybe. But why shouldn’t promises respect the love that created them?”

(c) 2013 by Jeff Duntemann. All Rights Reserved. Do not repost.

Odd Lots

Feb 23rd, 2013
by Jeff Duntemann.
5 comments
← Earlier Posts