Jeff Duntemann's Contrapositive Diary Rotating Header Image

A Tall Tree in a Tight Spot

IMG_2201 - 500 Wide.jpg

We had the big sumac tree by the front door cut down this morning. “Big” is no exaggeration, either: It was forty feet high, and two feet thick at the ground. (Look carefully and see Carol standing behind it.) It was a bad place for a tree that size, for several reasons. It was messy, and dropped seeds and leaves almost continuously between April and August. That was annoying, but what worried me was triggered by what happened to the guy right next door to the east of us: He had a biggish (but not even that big) mesquite tree snap in half in a windstorm and destroy the pergola over his back patio. I looked at the sumac and calculated what would happen if it lost structural integrity in any direction. If it fell to the west (toward me in the photo) well, ok. Any other direction, and it would take out one or both of two gates, part of our block wall, some or most of the guest room, and some or most of the front entrance, including our stained-glass encrusted front door.

That was a thick tree, probably as old as the original house, which is now 52 years. Some parts of the two main trunks were well over a foot thick, up higher than our roof line. I agonized over the decision, because it was a healthy tree that looked solid as a rock. But it was too close to the house, and even closer to the front gate. So we had a landscape company we knew and trusted come out and take it down. We also had them take down a much smaller mulberry tree that was not healthy. “Not healthy” is putting it mildly. See the photo of the mulberry’s main trunk, below.

20180130_075945 - Cropped - 500 Wide.jpg

Well, that had certainly been the right call.

The mulberry was quick; they had it down in twenty minutes. The sumac took the rest of the morning. The crew knew very well what was at stake, so it probably took more time than it might have, had it been growing in the middle of the back yard. It came down a chunk at a time, with each chunk tied on a stout rope and steered expertly down to terra firma. Some of the chunks were impressive.

Down, down, down. Then: Six or seven feet above the base of the trunk, the cross-section started to change. Take a look:

20180130_103838 - Cropped 500 Wide.jpg

Egad. The damned thing was hollower than the sickly mulberry. After I took this shot, I dug into the chocolate-colored stuff surrounding the void and tore huge chunks out with my fingernails. There were probably three inches of actual wood–sometimes less–forming a 15″ trunk. I wanted to yell into the hole: “Hey, any elves in there? The chipper’s at the curb. Last chance to come out, guys. Bring cookies.”

Any regrets we had taking down the tree vanished the instant we saw this. Sure, there was solid wood all the way around. But consider the lever-arm torque on the tree trunk if a really bad west wind hit the tree’s canopy. Crunch! We could have been out our front entranceway.

There’s a downside to losing that tree: It provided considerable shade to the house in the worst of the summer. My electric bills are probably going to go up.

The major lesson in all this is that we assume trees are immortal, but they’re not. Trees live for some period of time, and then they die. The typical lifespan of a sumac like ours is 30-50 years. We were already past that. The rot at its core was nothing worse than old age. I remember when I was a kid, and the cottonwood trees in the parkway on Clarence Avenue all started to die at once. The city had planted them, six to a block on both sides of the streets, when they platted the neighborhood in 1929. But once the market crashed, nobody wanted to build homes there until the last of the 1940s, when the trees were already twenty years old. By 1960, the cottonwoods were over thirty years old, which is pretty much end-of-life for that species of tree. Just about every one was hollow enough to hold a whole bakery’s worth of elves, including a few really fat ones. My sister remembers that one of them on another street fell on a house and did some serious damage, and since the parkways belonged to the city, wham! Hundreds of cottonwoods vanished in a couple of years.

A postscript: Our cottonwood was the last one on the street to go. When we saw the logs stacked up, we realized that it was solid to the core. So trees have bell curves too. Bummer.

Anyway. We have plenty of other trees, none of them (thankfully) quite that close to the house. We have a gorgeous Aleppo pine in the front yard, outside the wall, that may exceed fifty feet high. Google tells me Aleppo pines typically live for 150 years. If I ever feel the need to hug a tree, well, I’m going with that one.

6 Comments

  1. Larry Nelson says:

    About four years ago we had a 80 foot tall, 100 year old maple in our front yard. It was showing signs of poor health. My brother (who runs a tree service in another town) just happened to be at our house for dinner. I asked him “Should we take it down?”. He asked “Where do you sleep?”. I pointed to our room. “I would if I were you” was his reply.

    When it was cut down it was about five feet in diameter and had two inches of live wood around the outer edge. The whole rest of the inside was punk.

    Our neighbors took out three sister maple trees of similar size at the same time. It looked like a full blown logging operation on our street for a couple of days.

    Sadly, trees do die. The child of the first owner (who was born in the house and then lived in it for 70 years) remembered when the tree was planted. That made the removal doubly sad.

    The replacement blaze maple is growing nicely, more than two feet year and is already 30′ tall. A copper beech we planted thirty years ago when we first moved into the house is now forty feet tall and a beautiful specimen. Trees re-calibrate your time perspective.

    1. Lee Hart says:

      “Trees re-calibrate your time perspective.” That’s for sure!

      I recall a story from a famous British university. The student dining hall had 7 huge oak beams supporting the ceiling. A student discovered sawdust trickling out of one. He was told, “Ach; the oak gets wormy after a hundred years.”

      There were actually holes in the outside wall to allow the beams to be replaced. But where do you find oak beams that big? The university forrester was called. He pulled out his records, which showed where the oaks were harvested for those beams the *last* time they were replaced. They went to the locations, and there stood 7 more magnificant oaks.

      They were cut down, and the beams were replaced. And 7 more oaks were planted, to be ready for the *next* 100-year replacement.

      1. I wrote about something along these lines back in 1999:

        http://www.duntemann.com/VisionThing57.htm

        Long horizons are almost extinct. This recalls the old saying: “England is where a hundred miles is a long distance, and the US is where a hundred years is a long time.”

  2. John Hall AC2RL says:

    Doh! You shouldn’ta done that. Tall trees are for wire antennas. You never know when you’ll need a 160 meter loop running around your property. Now you’ll have to cobble up some kind of mast. (You don’t have restrictive covenants, do you?)

    1. Well, in truth I have a taller tree (an Aleppo pine) and two ginormously tall palm trees, which I consider stealth masts. (The damned things may b 60 or 70 feet tall, and I will have to hire one of the palm-trimmer guys who run up and down those things for a living to attach the high end of a planned sloper.)

      One of the first criteria we specified to our realtor was that there could be NO HOA and NO specific provisions in deed restrictions mentioning antennas. What CCRs we have are brief and almost entirely concerned with setbacks. No mention of antennas. There are other guys in the immediate area with what I consider industrial-class antenna farms, plus a few odd dipoles and ground planes, so antennas are nothing novel here. We were sick for the first three weeks in January, so my engineered ground system hasn’t been begun yet. The goal is to have the landscapers use their mondo earth auger to drill me a 10″ hole as deep as they can get it. Then I drive my polished and spear-pointed 8′ copper ground rod into the center of the hole, and fill the rest of the hole with bentonite clay, with a length of 1/2″ sched 40 perforated PVC pipe running to the bottom of the hole so I can pour in epsom salt solution every so often to keep the conductivity up. With a good ground of that sort (the soil here is predictably dry and not conductive to RF) all the rest will fall into place. There’s a husky tripod on the roof of my small garage (where my shack is) that used to hold a 10′ mast and a gain TV antenna. That mast will hold a VHF discone for 2M and up. Not sure what I’ll do for 6M yet. I’m looking at trap verticals for HF. Had one in Rochester NY (1979-1984) and worked the world with it, granted that it was mounted above soil that was perilously close to what some would call “swamp” with near-ideal conductivity.

      So things are coming along. Will report here as stuff is actually accomplished.

  3. Bob Fegert says:

    What a shame…that tree looked great there.

Leave a Reply to Bob Fegert Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *