{"id":556,"date":"2009-01-27T12:19:29","date_gmt":"2009-01-27T16:19:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=556"},"modified":"2009-01-27T12:19:29","modified_gmt":"2009-01-27T16:19:29","slug":"an-outrageous-experiment-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=556","title":{"rendered":"An Outrageous Experiment, Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>(Continued from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=554\">yesterday&#8217;s entry<\/a>; the series began on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=552\">1\/25\/2009<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Recapping: After losing five pounds by not eating Cheerios every morning for breakfast, I tried replacing the calories with protein and fat calories to see if those five pounds would return. I deliberately ate more to see if I could accelerate the process, but what I ate more of was limited to eggs, meat, and cheese. It backfired, and I lost two more pounds in ten days.<\/p>\n<p>When I told Carol on the phone that I was down to 148, she told me to knock it off and go back to my Cheerios. So on the 11th day I called a halt to the experiment. Most of the meat and cheese was gone by then, and I&#8217;d had to get another dozen eggs and more yogurt. But I started cooking carbs again: primarily rice, and some conventional pasta. Since I was still batching it, I did weird things like having a bowl of Cheerios as my carb course at supper, next to a yummy plate full of formerly frozen shrimp and a side of creamy cole slaw.<\/p>\n<p>That was only about a week ago, and as of this morning, stark naked and dripping wet, I weighed 151. It only took a week of slamming carbs again to gain three pounds. Carol got home last night. I&#8217;m a much happier guy, and will be returning to eating like a real human being. The only long-term change is that I&#8217;m having an egg for breakfast instead of Cheerios. Keeping my edge all morning has been delicious.<\/p>\n<p>This experience didn&#8217;t surprise me too much. I&#8217;ve run into the effect before, although I never had the opportunity to do anything quite this gonzo to test it. Back when I was in college, <a href=\"http:\/\/junkbox.com\/gallery\/JeffAndCarol\/jeffcarolthirdlake1970\">I weighed about 125 pounds<\/a> and was mostly skin and bones. Over the years I gradually put on weight, as people do. By the time I was 45 I weighed 170, and Carol told me that I was starting to look several months&#8217; pregnant. Then something interesting happened: I threw a bad kidney stone, which forced me to stop drinking three or four Snapple bottled sweetened iced teas every day. I stopped drinking anything but water while the stone was being analyzed, and I lost several pounds almost immediately. This intrigued me, and when I started drinking sodas again, I drank only diet. The weight stayed off, and started drifting slowly downward. (None of this is news to my long-time readers.)<\/p>\n<p>The next event happened a year or so later when I stopped eating rice bowls down at the corner for lunch every day. I switched to sandwiches or pizza (and no longer ate a softball-sized wad of white rice on a daily basis) and lost another slug of weight very quickly. My weight since then has wandered between 155 and 160. Once I started weight training in 2004, it drifted down to 155 and has been remarkably consistent since then&#8230;until last summer, when I stopped eating Cheerios for breakfast.<\/p>\n<p>And now the experiment is over. So&#8230;what did I learn? Mostly, this: The conventional wisdom that Fat Bad, Carbs Good, is not unassailable, and the whole business is <em>hugely<\/em> more complex than most people think. It&#8217;s not an issue of thermodynamics, as far too many people believe. We do not &#8220;burn&#8221; calories in the same sense that we burn leaves out in the alley. Metabolism is an enormously complex biological mechanism, one that we still don&#8217;t understand as well as we should&#8211;or even as well as we think we do.<\/p>\n<p>I was certainly struck by this: Changes happened a lot more quickly than our conventional understanding of calories and weight gain\/loss would explain. If it were simply a matter of wadding on weight when we eat more than we burn, or losing weight when we burn more than we eat, it should take a lot longer. A pound, after all, represents 3,500 calories, and my intake deltas were nowhere near large enough to account for the changes I saw as quickly as I saw them, both on the downswing and on the upswing. I&#8217;m aware from my reading of the tendency to shed water on low-carb diets. I took care to drink more water than I generally do, and did not notice myself losing any more than usual. Something else must be going on, and while I&#8217;m still researching it, I think the answers may lie in a book I read almost by accident a month ago, a book that triggered this whole crazy idea.<\/p>\n<p>(To be continued as soon as I can manage it.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Continued from yesterday&#8217;s entry; the series began on 1\/25\/2009.) Recapping: After losing five pounds by not eating Cheerios every morning for breakfast, I tried replacing the calories with protein and fat calories to see if those five pounds would return. I deliberately ate more to see if I could accelerate the process, but what I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,23],"tags":[37,39],"class_list":["post-556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-daybook","category-ideasandanalysis","tag-food","tag-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}