{"id":319,"date":"2008-07-02T14:32:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-02T18:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=319"},"modified":"2009-01-14T17:51:52","modified_gmt":"2009-01-14T21:51:52","slug":"mainstreaming-sit-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=319","title":{"rendered":"Mainstreaming Sit-Down"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I find much or most of the debate on the obesity explosion puzzling.               Many major American cities are trying to pass laws severely limiting               fast food outlets or banning them entirely, blaming them for our               increasingly fat population. The sheer violence of the debate (cruise               pertinent online discussions and you&apos;ll see what I mean) suggests               that more is going on here than a discussion of nutrition, but I&apos;ll               be damned if I can figure out just what, though I will speculate               below.<\/p>\n<p>As I&apos;ve said here more than once, obesity, like most health issues,               is more complex than most of us would like to admit. It&apos;s about               calories but not <i>only<\/i> calories, and contrary to conventional               wisdom, one calorie is like any other calorie&#8230;if you&apos;re a calorimeter.               Sugar calories do different things in the body than fat calories,               yet you wouldn&apos;t know this trying to get a grip on the problem online.               The speed with which I dropped belly fat when I basically gave up               sugar was startling. Sleep loss is also a factor, according to the               Mayo Clinic. (Alas, the Mayo Clinic still believes in the BMI, which               does not distinguish <i>at all<\/i> between fat and muscle. Ummm&#8230;and               you guys are doctors?)<\/p>\n<p>I&apos;ve read a lot of speculation as to what kicked off the obesity               epidemic in the midlate 80s. That&apos;s when high-fructose corn syrup               went mainstream and drove cane sugar out of soft drinks. It was               when our high-speed, high-stress always-on culture kicked into high               gear and 60-hour weeks became a commonplace. It&apos;s when the overall               inflation-adjusted price of food fell to historic lows. And it was               also the time when something else happened: an explosion of low-end               &#8220;sit-down&#8221; restaurants fielded by national franchises.               You see them everywhere: Red Robin, Applebees, Black-Eyed Pea, TGI               Friday&apos;s, and so on. They are legion. And if you&apos;re a true calorie               believer, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/22220895\/?pg=1#TDY_RestaurantSecrets\">the               caloric content of their dishes will take your breath away<\/a>:               One order of Outback&apos;s Aussie Cheese Fries appetizer contains <i>2,900<\/i>               calories. Even expressed by weight, it is to boggle: A large Maggiano&apos;s               pasta dish gets you over <i>two pounds<\/i> of noodles on a 15-inch               plate.<\/p>\n<p>Wow.<\/p>\n<p>The tirade against fast-food restaurants is peculiar in that it               does not recognize that fast-food portions are generally smaller               than those at sit-down restaurants, and more to the point, fast-food               items are what old-time IT guys would call &#8220;unbundled&#8221;:               You can get menu items separately if you want them. You can get               a single small burger\u2014or a Triple. You can get fries or no               fries, and fries in sizes. On the much simpler sit-down restaurant               menus, you must get the potatoes with the steak, and the portion               size is always&#8230;lots. And anyone who says with a straight face               that there&apos;s more fat in fast food than at casual dining sit-downs               is either lying or doesn&apos;t get out much.<\/p>\n<p>We didn&apos;t go to restaurants much when I was a kid, in part because               back then, sit-down restaurants were higher-end, and expensive.               We had to dress up on special occasions to go to Llandl&apos;s or the               Kenilworth Inn in Lincolnwood. The notion of &#8220;casual dining&#8221;               was still pretty uncommon, and probably considered a contradiction               in terms by dining purists. (What there was fell into the separately               interesting category of &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Greasy_spoon\">greasy               spoons<\/a>.&#8221;) Since 1985 or so, sit-downs went mainstream on               a huge scale, as corporate restaurant franchises gobbled up key               slots at the corners of megamalls and major intersections. Your               average American went from dining out a few times a year to a couple               of times a week, with portion sizes that I still find boggling.<\/p>\n<p>My point here is that crucifying fast food as though it were the               sole cause of obesity (or even the major contributor) is magical               thinking, and has more than a whiff of politics in it. (When reading               things like <i>Fast Food Nation<\/i> I see union opportunism and               attacks from the Vega System.) Nothing is ever that simple, and               if we keep insisting that it is, no progress will ever be made.               It&apos;s not about McDonald&apos;s. It&apos;s about genetics, metabolism, portion               control, exercise, sugar, stress, and sleep\u2014and probably fifteen               other things, most of which we still haven&apos;t defined. Let us not               pull the trigger with the wrong guy in our sites, just to be shooting               <i>something<\/i>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I find much or most of the debate on the obesity explosion puzzling. Many major American cities are trying to pass laws severely limiting fast food outlets or banning them entirely, blaming them for our increasingly fat population. The sheer violence of the debate (cruise pertinent online discussions and you&apos;ll see what I mean) suggests [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ideasandanalysis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=319"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":333,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319\/revisions\/333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}