{"id":4699,"date":"2022-06-08T19:27:08","date_gmt":"2022-06-09T02:27:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=4699"},"modified":"2022-06-08T19:34:40","modified_gmt":"2022-06-09T02:34:40","slug":"is-substack-special","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/?p=4699","title":{"rendered":"Is Substack Special?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometime very early this year, probably January, a reader asked me in an email what I thought of <a href=\"https:\/\/substack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Substack<\/a>, and if Contra would be better off there. She likes my work, and told me she &#8220;binged&#8221; on my old entries. At the time, I&#8217;d heard of Substack but never looked at it. Over the last couple of days I googled on the site, went there, and learned a great deal about it.<\/p>\n<p>The answer is no. I&#8217;ll be 70 in three weeks, and I don&#8217;t have the stamina to try to blog for money. Ten or fifteen years ago, I would have been sorely tempted. No more. I have my loyal readers, and I don&#8217;t need the money that badly. But&#8230;but&#8230;if I were on Substack, I&#8217;d be <em>famous!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>No. Anybody can be on Substack. If I were <em>already<\/em> famous, I might try it. But I&#8217;m not. (I do have a certain fame. It&#8217;s five miles deep and three inches wide.)<\/p>\n<p>Basically, Substack is Kindle for newsletters. And newsletters in this context are long-form blog entries. You can charge readers a subscription fee, minimum $5\/month, or any dollar amount greater than that. (Newsletters can also be free if you prefer.) Readers can then read your entries on the Web, or on the iPhone app. (They&#8217;ve been a thing since 2017, and they don&#8217;t yet have an Android app? That&#8217;s just, well, stupid. They say they&#8217;re working on one. Sheesh, I hope so!)<\/p>\n<p>Substack has thousands of newsletters, and as of the end of 2021, over a million paid subscribers. The top 10 writers in aggregate make $20M per year. That&#8217;s better money than I&#8217;ve ever made doing anything. But if you look at who the top ten writers are, it becomes painfully obvious: All of them were famous working in other venues long before Substack ever existed.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve read Andrew Sullivan sporadically for a lot of years. I read him on the late suck.com back in the &#8217;90s and lots of other places since. He&#8217;s the #5 writer on Substack. He&#8217;s interesting, funny, and doesn&#8217;t bend the knee to partisan bitchlords demanding unquestioning allegiance. I haven&#8217;t subscribed yet, but I may. He&#8217;s damned good.<\/p>\n<p>Other writers I&#8217;ve heard of and read elsewhere include <a href=\"https:\/\/bariweiss.substack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bari Weiss<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.slowboring.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Matthew Iglesias<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/taibbi.substack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Matt Taibbi<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/greenwald.substack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Glenn Greenwald<\/a>. (Greenwald is #1 on Substack.) A chap I know, <a href=\"https:\/\/tomknighton.substack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tom Knighton<\/a>, has three different Substack newsletters. (You&#8217;re not limited to one.) I&#8217;m sure other people out on the edges of my circles have Substack newsletters. (Have one? Let me know!) However, I&#8217;m guessing that there&#8217;s an 80\/20 rule on Substack (or maybe a 90\/10 rule) stating that 20% of the writers make 80% of the money. That&#8217;s the rule in a lot of business models, Kindle included.<\/p>\n<p>That may just be the way the universe works. You have to build a platform, as the agents put it. In other words, you have to promote yourself, especially if you don&#8217;t already have a pre-existing reputation and thousands of cheering fans. As some of my self-published author friends on Kindle have learned, you sometimes have to do so much promoting that you don&#8217;t have the time (or the energy) to write new material.<\/p>\n<p>So I won&#8217;t be there. I&#8217;m having too much fun on 20M and writing new SF. What, then, do I think? No question: It&#8217;s worth it, if you&#8217;re young and energetic and can write interesting text on a definable topic on a regular basis that at least a few people might pay $5 a month for. I have one concern about Substack&#8217;s viability: They do not currently discriminate against conservative writers, or centrist writers who don&#8217;t care for progressive dudgeon. Apparently a number of progressive writers have ditched Substack because&#8211;the horror!&#8211;<em>Substack doesn&#8217;t censor conservative viewpoints<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Not yet. If they ever start, it&#8217;ll be the end of them. In the meantime, you have your choice of a very broad spectrum of very good writers. A lot of the posts are free, and you can sample any author you want. I&#8217;m budgeting myself four paid subscriptions, not because it&#8217;s expensive, but because there are only so many hours in a day.<\/p>\n<p>Go take a look. I was moderately impressed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometime very early this year, probably January, a reader asked me in an email what I thought of Substack, and if Contra would be better off there. She likes my work, and told me she &#8220;binged&#8221; on my old entries. At the time, I&#8217;d heard of Substack but never looked at it. Over the last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[40,242,20],"class_list":["post-4699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ideasandanalysis","tag-blogging","tag-censorship","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4699"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4699\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4702,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4699\/revisions\/4702"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.contrapositivediary.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}